During a Tuesday hearing at the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, the DOJ urged a three-judge panel to issue an emergency stay of a lower court order and allow the Trump administration’s deployment of the California National Guard to continue in Los Angeles — going so far as to argue a president’s federalization of militia can’t be second-guessed by the courts, even if the chief executive mobilized forces from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., simultaneously.

top 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 200 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The DOJ attorney emphasized that “sustained mob violence” in response to ICE raids is “no ordinary civil unrest,” claimed that it is ongoing, and asserted that such violence is “expressly aimed at preventing federal officers from enforcing federal law,” supporting Trump’s federalization of the Golden State’s National Guard.

That's just a lie, isn't it?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's standard Republican strategy. A lot of the cases that ended up in front of the Supreme Court are straight up manufactured. In the case of the lady who refused to create a website for a gay wedding, they contacted the guy who supposedly made the request and he'd never heard of it before. Republican operatives basically looked up a gay guy in San Francisco and used his details in the website's contact form.

    Despite all that, the courts happily took the case and ruled on a complete fiction. Same thing happened in the case of the coach that forced his football team to pray.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Well, it's mostly true. I mean this isn't normal civil unrest. This is the people being fed up with a government trying to use fear as a weapon against it's own people. And the mob violence isn't generally preventing federal officers from doing what they want, it is in response to it. There is some mob shouting preventing some federal officers ftom doing what they want.

    But issue at hand is that the law is very vague about the quantity needed to trigger the allowance of using the national guard. By just reading it, ICE could send a single agent to arrest 5 people in a facility that has 500. If the people stop the arrests, then it meets the written requirements. It ludicrous though to interpret it that way of course. But since it was written so poorly, we are at the mercy of the courts.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 106 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Telling the court that the court has no say. Bold move Cotton….

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It doesn't.

    When you've got control of the armed services of the government. And you tell the opposition "we've got the guns. Fuck are you going to do about it". Law becomes paper. And the only thing left is the law of the jungle. In other words. War

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 80 points 1 year ago

    Tastes like fascism.

  • source
  • [–] 72 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So much to unpack there...

    So the bestest president evah now caused a rebellion? Did that ever happen before to any president? Oh yeah, under trump 1 there was January the 6th, instigated and orchestrated by king Cheeto

    And now there is another rebellion?

    I mean, it's demonstrations but seeing that distinction is hard for smooth brain idiots

    Then telling judges that they can't say no because else they can't stop a rebellion? I mean, you STARTED it, if you want to stop it's really easy: STOP BREAKING THE LAW!

    And stop telling judges they can't do their job

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    The keyword is rebellion...

    But it is not really about current protests ... it is to have all lights on green when there actually IS a rebellion cooking so the response can be swift and far beyond proportions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Do you want a rebellion? Cause this how you get rebellions

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Yes, they do, because it will distract from the US joining a war in Iran, and from all of trumps other crimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I thought the war in Iran was to distract from the protests? What are they going to do to distract from the rebellion then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The foreign wars arent the point. The foreign wars are a means to an end

    The end. Is being able to isolate one's self from the rest of the world. Enjoy perpetual dictatorial rule through martial law. And rule your corner of the world like an absolute monarchy. The other parts of the world can deal with their own regional warlords like Russia and China

    The foreign wars. Like starting a war with Iran. Are likely going to be used as a vehicle to declare martial law in the USA. And once that happens. Trump is never going away until death takes him

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wasnt aware the DOJ could order judges to find in certain ways in cases.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • The time to rebel is now

    These people want you dead

    Arm yourselves.

    Do not go quietly when they come for you

    Drag one with you to your grave

  • source
  • [–] 128 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is dictatorship. It's mild only because no one is fighting back. The moment someone tries the gloves will come off.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    That is how they want everyone to feel so there isn't much fight back. However, I think if there was, and the gloves came off, it may also split Republicans and even Trumpers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    well, what did the ninth circuit have to say in response?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 31 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Rebellion is the American way

    What are the real estate prices under rocks these days?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    You remember how America became sovereign, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    With help from the French. Who's gonna come save you this time?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Russia

    Except they're only interested in supporting factions that keep perpetually causing chaos.

    Russia can't fight a war to save its life. So it needs opponents like America incapacitated and out of their imperialist affairs in Europe and Asia

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    That's some incredibly intense kneeling they're doing right there. Who knew the DOJ was so good at kissing the floor?

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    quashing protests, will eventually leader to larger protests and then uprising, and maybe a rebellion eventually.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Arrogant shits, aren't they?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    24 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    1 comment in c/trump_watch@lemmy.world view that post