all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They've been "upgrading" the hardware and software for their fingerprint scanner since they moved away from the only one that ever worked well: the dedicated sensor on the back of the 5. Bring that one back. Every single pixel since the 5 has had an absolutely garbage fingerprint scanner, including the 9.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • The rear scanner on my old Pixel 2 was so much faster and more reliable than any under-screen sensor I've ever used.

    I don't know why they can't just stick with what works. It's been over 5 years since under-screen sensors hit the market and they're still worse than their predecessors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    That's a great idea. I have deleted and redone my thumb prints multiple times because they won't be recognized on every other unlock on my P9 Pro

  • source
  • 21 comments in c/android@lemdro.id view that post
    [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Still pissed about they cutting ties with custom rom community

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What’s happened? Been using an iPhone for the last 2 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Considering this is Google we're talking about and they're moving towards the "Let's be evil for the heck of it" motto, is there a chance they're uploading the scanned biometrics for keepsies?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    In theory the biometric data lives in a special part of the phone hardware that the software can't (generally) access. It's one of the big deals about phone biometrics - it should be really hard to leak.

    AFAIU, the fingerprint stored on the phone is incredibly low quality, so I'm not sure how much value it would have.

    Could they mess with that? Yes. Is there profit in getting a really low quality hash of every user's fingerprint? Probably not worth the hassle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm sorry, are you trying to suggest that Google is now going to store and track every Pixel user's biometrics? Why would you think that? What's changed now that suggests Google would even try that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Why would you think they wouldn't. Data is literally money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This site is almost worse than Reddit sometimes with the hyperbole and the nutty takes. No, Google isn't about to abuse its position, squander decades of goodwill and open itself up to regulatory hell to sell biometric data to some mythical boogie man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago

    Thankfully I'm not American so have waaaay more protections from "evil corporations" than you. But you sound like you should start wearing tinfoil around your brain to stop them from reading your thoughts - I mean, why wouldn't they if they could, right?

    Google isn't sharing your fingerprint to the government, mate. Let's be serious.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Ohhh that's a finger he's looking at on the screen. The thumbnail looks like something else.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    JUST PUT IT ON THE BACK...

    I hate that my screen blinds me and people nearby when I use biometrics. I understand the security problems with bio too, I guess I ought to just delete the option.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    *on the power button.

    My s10e had this, and it's the best IMO.

    You can also swipe it to pull down the notification shade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I hate that. My pixel tablet has it as well, and besides it being terribly unreliable which is surely just that particular implementation, it's also annoying when it does work. Just want to quickly turn on the screen to pause music or check a notification or something, and it'll just immediately unlock. No thanks, I prefer separate actions to be separate buttons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The pixel 9 doesn't do the blinding thing anymore, and it works pretty well. This is apparently an even better version of that.

    Don't disagree that on the back should be a thing too, the sensor on the back of the pixel 5 (IIRC?) was perfectly quick and had a few useful gestures you could use it for. I doubt it would increase the BOM much to just have both considering we're talking at phones that cost a grand

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Like others have already said the 9 doesn't use light/optics but it still sucks compared to the one on the back. I use, but generally dislike the P9 finger print reader. I've gone so far as not using a screen protector to help that stupid thing. Still has way too many error reads

  • source
  • parent
  • Hard pass, unless they revert their AOSP policies.

  • source