all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Glass is certainly better than undetonated bombs.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It’s probably plastic :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    For the range they're working with, it has to be glass. Plastic has way too much attenuation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    For what purpose?

    Is this some kind of tripwire movement detection system? Communications? A visual deterrent?

    Not much of a war tech enthusiast; first I've seen something like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I read that some drones are fibre optic controlled instead of radio, as it can't be jammed. This seems like a lot to be just that though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    That's exactly it. Every one of those lines was an FPV drone with a bomb. In addition to being impossible to jam, they also don't emit any signals so they're harder to detect.

    Oh and you'll notice in some FPV videos that the video degrades as the drone gets closer to the target. This is generally due to signal interruption because of trees or terrain in the way. Fiber drones can fly as low as they damn well please with perfect video.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Riiight, I forgot about wire-guided missiles/torpedos. Makes sense to use a similar system for war drones.

    Fiber-optic drones

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments