all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

The company that never sent a rocket in orbit is missioned to send a rover on the moon. Sounds like DEI to me!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    company that never sent a rocket in orbit

    Is fun as it was to tease Blue Origin for being an exclusively suborbital launch provider, this is no longer true. They achieved orbit with the maiden flight of New Glenn back in January. New Glenn is still yet to have its second launch, but BO are technically an orbital launch company now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Don't worry, I'm here to hate accurately.

    Ask the ESCAPADE team if this is a good idea. Mark 1 Pathfinder isn't launching this year, so Mark 1 with VIPER isn't launching next year. Now NASA gets to keep paying for storage and waiting and wondering.

    Also, calling Pathfinder a CLPS program is a joke. Blue was doing it anyways, and NASA paid for a single payload to get landing plume data, which, given the track record, will just be crash landing data.

    To be fair, Astrobotic Griffin 1 shouldn't have had a payload this valuable without being proven first, but a hypothetical Griffin 2 could have.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I'm happy VIPER has a new ride but genuinely baffled by everything about this

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    The same brilliant logic that gave us the the dumbest, most expensive moon landing program possible

  • source