all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 116 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm disappointed in Canada for not being anti-America enough 😆

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Setting the table for the future annexation. "Mistreatment of Americans in Canada" is pretty much all the excuse they need.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Didn’t Canada’s parliament just give Charlie Kirk a standing ovation? Wasn’t Alberta just talking about seceding? So is it only “elbows up” for some people?

    No country is immune.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Alberta is always talking about seceding. They never do because its all a show and theyre actually a bunch if cowards that would never do it. Just talk tough while everyone else rolls their eyes kinda thing.

    Quebec on the other hand...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    They don't go through with anything because it would backfire monumentally. Alberta's inclusion in the charter is mostly treaty lands, and to dissolve the province means the treaty owners get their land back. There's not much of Alberta that's not treaty lands, and the oil sands falls under that umbrella.

    To top that off, the tribes who are party to that treaty have already already said they would petition to rejoin Canada

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They did not. They gave a standing ovation to a speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • 49 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    15 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    11 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    11 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    6 comments in c/world view that post
    4 comments in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml view that post
    2 comments in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml view that post