Taxing Britain’s SUVs in line with other European countries could raise almost £2bn a year for the public finances, research has shown.

The Transport & Environment thinktank has urged the government to use the autumn budget to bring in a levy on the largest vehicles, which it said would reflect the damage they caused to the environment and infrastructure.

T&E said the current UK vehicle tax system was not keeping up with the change in the profile of cars sold, with heavier and more polluting cars escaping adequate taxation and coming to dominate the market.

An “SUV loophole” meant UK buyers paid up to 20 times less tax on the biggest models than counterparts in other European countries, it said. Vehicle tax on a new £85,000 BMW X5 would amount to £3,200 in the UK, but the sale would incur taxes of £66,600 in France – driving UK SUV sales to four times the level in France.

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 1 year ago

"Car makers have offered an alternative option of destroying democracy and implementing Nazi rule over the country."

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    The Transport & Environment thinktank has urged the government to use the autumn budget to bring in a levy on the largest vehicles, which it said would reflect the damage they caused to the environment and infrastructure.

    Has this 'thinktank' met the spineless tory wannabees that are in the government?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    It would be better to have no SUVs than to have the 2 billion pounds.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Instead they chose to cut lifesaving survival money for disabled people.

    As a disabled person with disabled friends in the UK. People will die because of this.

    Thanks Starmer.

  • source
  • 14 comments in c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    SUVs the jack of no trades and master of fewer. They're such a strange concept, forgo the ease of a hatchback, the space of an estate, the performance of a sports car, the utility of a 4x4 and in return you get to kill more kids when you hit them.

    I'm clearly not the target market with my '05 Civic that, because I live fairly rural, I put winter tires on. But, I don't understand what I'm missing. The wealthier around me are all in them, the rest of us are in hatchbacks and estates.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'd been bullied into renting a small SUV as we were 4 friends travelling abroad for a wedding. Thankfully the rental car lady had more sense and seeing all our bags threw a Fiat Tipo estate at us. That thing swallowed bags, very impressed.

    We're sweating our 10yr old SUV and then moving to an estate.... as long as my wife agrees :)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    More sloppy reporting from the guardian, at least proof read the work. Tax £66,610 on an £85,000 vehicle? 3 times as much as the cost in the uk of £3200? I think someone put another 0 on that, and they still managed to publish it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm not sure what the mistake is? France charge a £50k premium, so £66k tax doesn't sound unreasonable.

    It doesn't say that that £66k is 3 times the cost, it says there are 13 countries which have a greater acquisition tax than 3x the UK rate. As far as I can see, it doesn't mention the relative costs between the UK and France.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If it’s mean to be a single digit multiple of the uk tax, at 3k, then it can’t be 66k

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It's not meant to be a single digit multiple of the UK tax, I don't know where you're getting that from. The things which the article mentions as being single digit multiples are:

    In 13 countries, acquisition taxes for such an SUV are more than three times higher than the UK’s

    £3,200 in the UK, but the sale would incur taxes of £66,600 in France – driving UK SUV sales to four times the level in France.

    And the headline figure is "up to 20 times", which roughly matches the £66k.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    What's an SUV though because the industry has a lot of cars they call SUVs and quite a lot and don't look remotely like each other.

    I have an SUV from 2015 and the Volvo XC90 dwarfs it despite it apparently not been an SUV, so how does that work?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Volvo XC90

    I searched this and Volvo's page for it calls it a "Large mild hybrid SUV". Here's a Volvo XC90 compared to a BMW X1 from 2011-2015. It would seem that SUVs have been increasing in size ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yeah essentially at this point what I own easy effectively a large car and not an SUV. The term effectively being rendered irrelevant by car manufacturer. At this point it means any vehicle that is not a hatchback.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    I doubt it'd raise that much (the article states £1.72bn), as there seems to be an assumption increasing the tax wouldn't lead to a reduction in SUVs, and that everyone would just absorb the cost.

    However, I still say go ahead! Even if it only raises a quarter of that, that's still money coming in, and it means fewer SUVs on our roads. That's a win-win.

  • source