#Chatcontrol is OFF the table for now. ๐Ÿ’ชBut it will be back.Danish Minister of Justice and chief architect of the current Chat Control proposal, Peter Hummelgaard: "๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ธ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜†๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ'๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—น ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐˜†๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€."We have to keep fighting for #encryption and our right to #privacy ๐Ÿ”’ The clock is still ticking: tuta.com/blog/chat-control-cri

all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

@Tutanota Never everโ€ฆ

  • source
  • [โ€“] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Source: ft.dk/samling/20231/almdel/REU

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota We must finally put an end to being ruled by such lunatics, who give the bourgeoisie the tools to gain total control over the people.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota It is not states liberty to read my private messages, we are not in soviet russia

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota it's top of the hypocrisy from him. He will be as politician not impacted by chat control. Total bullshitman. Shame on him.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota hyggelig ist das leider nicht.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota hyggelig ist das leider nicht: "Wir mรผssen die vรถllig falsche Vorstellung durchbrechen, dass es jedermanns zivile Freiheit ist, รผber verschlรผsselte Messagingโ€‘Dienste zu kommunizieren."Definiere "wir"!

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota dear Mr. Hummelgaard, I suggest you get with the program and read up on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, especially article 12; and the European Convention on Human Rights, article 8.Otherwise people might think you're a fascist.thehaguepeace.org/site/what-aren.wikipedia.org/wiki/European

  • source
  • @Tutanota This quote freezes my blood, the more it goes the more it's the elites against the people.

  • source
  • @Tutanota Entenjagd ... Hasenjagd ... Enten...

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota what the f**k is wrong with politicians. Why mostly the stupid ones are in power in the world

  • source
  • @Tutanota @thegibson itโ€™s everyoneโ€™s civil liberty to communicate privately, the encryption is just the best solution we have for that. Anti-privacy advocates always try to deflect attention from that core point.

  • source
  • @Tutanota We instead must break with the totally erroneous perception of politicians that it is their god-given right to know everything that's happening in innocent citizens' lives.

  • source
  • @Tutanota Hummelgaard is the embodyment of a facepalm. His political opinions are almost always brute force and/or unsofisticated. He has the position he has, because he is willing to push the governments unpopular policies forward. His collegues in government can hide behind him, almost like a meat-shield. He does not understand what he is legislating, as this quote clearly shows.Complete moron.Source: I'm Danish.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_HuHummelgaard denies privacy is a civil liberty and advocates for others to follow suit.What an absolutely terrifying individual. Like, truly Orwellian mindset - in an absolutely literal sense with no exaggeration or dramatisation. Just straight-up believing that your citizens shouldn't have privacy.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota Iโ€™d like for him to elaborate on the word โ€œerroneousโ€.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    @Tutanota it should have stayed on the table......so it could have been voted down for good. #sad

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    @Tutanota This is a TTS rendering of your post that contains "characters" from the Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols block, to simulate "bold" text.Roughly what people using screenreaders get to hear.

    An audio file that is a text-to-speech rendering of the post this post is replying to. All characters taken from the Mathematical Sans-Serif Bold range are spelled individually. The respective text in normal characters is "We must break with the totally erroneous perception that it is everyone's civil liberty to communicate on encrypted messaging services".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    @Tutanota His comments don't particularly surprise me given the overall tendency to limit civil rights as much as possible.However, they do disgust me.

  • source
  • @Tutanota We must break through the mistaken assumption that any government, authority or state has the right to invade the privacy of its citizens and monitor their communications, in whatever form.Be prepared for their next attemptโ€ฆ

  • source