The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.

The message is "If you disagree with me, you will be banned"

Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.

top 88 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 158 points 1 year ago (15 children)

We don't need Reddit's power tripping back

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Do you really expect the platform that lets anybody form their personal power tripping fiefdom to inexplicably not draw those people in? No centralization doesn't mean you're free of the particular flavor of power tripping you experienced, it means there are many cells of various levels of power tripping with little to no oversight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    The federative structure of the fediverse means that your average community moderator is way more accountable than a subreddit moderator is on reddit, to be fair.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    In theory maybe, but have we actually seen a community migrate away from a sub or the admins step in because of power tripping?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Onehundredninetysix and the Trek meme split.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The 196 mitosis was due to mods literally closing the sub, what caused the trek split?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Actually, due to some mod shenanigans, they tried to close the community to move it to a less trans-friendly instance, where the use of neopronouns would not be enforced. The community said no and formed a new community on their original instance, got new mods, hookers, and blackjack.

    https://lemmy.cafe/post/12094663

    As for the Trek split, here's a long, detailed, long post about it...

    https://lemmy.world/post/11959024

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well that wasn't due to power-tripping though. That was because lemm.ee shut down lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 121 points 1 year ago (25 children)
  • [–] [S] 86 points 1 year ago (24 children)

    And this is the second time in just over a day that I've seen moderators abusing the ability to monitor how people vote.

    This behaviour undermines good faith participation. Users should not be afraid of copping bans for using the downvote button as they feel is appropriate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    This behaviour undermines good faith participation. Users should not be afraid of copping bans for using the downvote button as they feel is appropriate.

    As a moderator, I can see who votes on what and how in my community. But it is not my job to really do anything with that information (except if I notice a brigading attack / vote manipulation, then I might keep an eye on users for that). So I don't even look at them. The community hasn't been brigaded yet, and since its a moderately low traffic community, it would be pretty obvious if that ever happened.

    But votes are information that normal users should definitely not be able to see at all. Eventually, sooner than later most likely, it will lead to "User X voted 'wrong' on Y" posts. You and I both know Lemmy users cannot be trusted to be mature enough to not do that kind of Fecal Flinging, especially from the comfort of online anonymity, and once that starts it's not going to stop.

    Users upvote or downvote posts for ten million different reasons. Nobody should feel like they can't vote how they want on a post for fear of a moderator ban or other users yelling at them. If they are engaging in vote manipulation, its a different story, but people doing that are not only using a single account, so they know what they are doing and should expect nevative consequences. I'm not disagreeing with what you're saying, just adding on that beyond a moderator's ethical duty regarding (not) taking action for vote activity, normal users should also be held to the same ethical duty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yes and no.

    There are accounts who genuinely do go around downvoting en masse without any contributions. When I was growing my community, I caught about 5 accounts - some with no post history, and no contribution history on my community doing it. They also had a long mod log history of bans for doing it elsewhere.

    So I banned them because they kept burying new posts. That is my right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    But votes are information that normal users should definitely not be able to see at all.

    Votes on Lemmy are public. lemvotes.org exists, and Friendica and mbin both expose votes, and then obviously it's decently simple (though not super-trivial like those three methods) to set up your own instance and look over all the votes.

    You might feel that there should be a special category of "lesser" (you say normal) user that is unable to see votes, even though another category of user is able to. We could talk about that philosophically, but regardless, normal users can see votes. Vote accordingly. The error lies with the Lemmy UI being designed in a way that doesn't make it clear to people that their votes are not fully private.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

    Hey I just wanna pop in and say I crossposted your post about lemmyusa over to power tripping bastards on dbzero the other day, and we actually had a mod from there come on and discuss things.

    I think its a bit more complex than just... them clearly doing mod abuse or manipulation.

    From their POV, they were basically getting hit with a mass wave of downvotes, as well as some genuinely unnaceptable harassment... and they basically panicked and went into lockdown mode.

    Maybe you would be interested in adding to that discussion?

    https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/53271052

    Also, just... in general, the whole point of the ye power trippin bastards comm is to report and discuss potential mod/admin abuse scenarios, in case you'd maybe like to post stuff there yourself...

    You ... seem to be on something of a tear of call outs, so, maybe you'd be interested.

    EDIT: There's... in theory at least, supposed to be more of a structured way of making such a report... which ironically i kinda sorta broke by doing a crosspost, but uh ... ???

    Anyway, more specifically relevant to this threelon person... yeah i dont find this behavior surprising, they are obviously a massive elon stan and their personality is collapsing as it becomes harder and harder to deny that, even in just a purely technical sense, leaving politics as far aside as possible... yeah elon is actually just a con artist fradulent idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    Thanks for the context and for cross posting, this is turning into an interesting discussion across a wider variety of skill sets. Skill sets, as in the following: power users, people who don't like mods and have done it before, people who have never modded but know exactly how it should be done, basic end users who are former mods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (14 children)

    Hey Verity, I support your right to do this (note: those are all my comments), even if you don't!

    Have a great day, and don't shy away from that downvote button <3

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Wow, you're calling me out too and I'm not even a mod any more. Keep that powdered wig high and lice-free, Robespierre.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    hah 'Robespierre' - Good one, probably.

    Just funny you are serial downvoting in defence of banning people for serial downvoting :D

    Let me guess, hypocrisy is only cool when you do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    That's not hypocrisy. People who support moderators rights to ban people from their community for mass downvoting aren't saying no-one should ever downvote, and that all bans for downvoting are automatically justified.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    This post is about threelon banning multiple people for downvoting one (1) time on one (1) post.

    And it is hypocrisy, along with a helping of poor reading comprehension apparently. If you disagree with this post, you would actually have been banned several times by now lol.

    But seeing as you are talking about my other post, how many times do you believe a user should be allowed to disagree before it warrants a ban for disagreeing too much?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    Yes, I know what the post is about. I'm just talking about generally here. You can downvote, and still be in favour of public upvoting and downvoting.

    But seeing as you are talking about my other post, how many times do you believe a user should be allowed to disagree before it warrants a ban for disagreeing too much?

    That's a false premise regarding my position. It's not about any particular number or specific threshold being met. I think it's reasonable for a community moderator to ban someone who never contributes to the community but instead just downvotes anything on the page. Especially if its a small community trying to grow. There are people on my communities now that downvote, but they also interact and also upvote, and they don't just downvote everything. So it's whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Downvoting is contributing, just in a way you apparently don't like.

    You should step down as a mod. Also please leave me alone, we have already had this conversation, and I made myself very clear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Downvoting is contributing, just in a way you apparently don't like.

    I disagree.

    You should step down as a mod. Also please leave me alone, we have already had this conversation, and I made myself very clear.

    You literally just asked me a question, and I replied.

    Furthermore: This is a public thread. I'll reply to who I like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Cool, just a shitty mod harassing a user because they cant control their emotions. Speaks for itself, really.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Replying to you in a public thread is harassing? You can just block me, you know. Or choose not to reply.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Following me to another thread to relitigate something we have fully explored is creepy stalker behaviour, yes.

    I did choose not to reply, in the last thread. Please show some self control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    This is a different chain in the same thread. I browsed it and saw a claim by you I thought was unfair. You ask questions, get answers, make accusations, get pushback and then cry harassment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I eagerly look forward to receiving my pushbike.

    Okay I'm going to stop replying here, for the second time. Please try not to "incidentally" run into me again, it's getting embarrassing.

    And you think you are even handed enough to moderate multiple communities? I wouldn't trust you moderate my rice cooker, and it's automatic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    The "pushbike" was autocomplete. Edited now.

    Again, this is a public forum. I don't seek anyone down but I feel free to reply to anyone.

    I haven't done anything wrong in my communities, and have given the Fediverse their only active TV comm.

  • source
  • parent
  • I downvoted your comments because I'm petty and it's fun and it doesn't matter very much. We started out all high minded and now we're here, in the mud, slinging mud, like the Jacobins. So you win. Here's a box of wheat starch for your 'do, live it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    It's also blatant vote manipulation in keeping their personal content from being lower on the front page. Ban all the downvoters and suddenly your posts look very popular!

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So it's literally just Elon.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago

    I made the list!

    I upvote most of threelonmusketeers' posts (voyager confirms my votes are net +44) , but my down vote finger gets itchy when I see a string of pro Elmo content.

    Not sure about that specific case.

  • source
  • [+] 56 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago

    I hope that dipshit is reading this thread. Ban me, too!

  • source
  • [+] 80 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Power hungry people seeking validation without real-world obligations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Not all mods are like that, of course. My instance admins had to ask me like three times to be a moderator for one of their communities because I refused them multiple times. I only said yes because it was an unmoderated/undermoderated (at the time), low traffic community, and felt bad that I had refused so many times.

    I used to be a forum admin for a gaming/programming forum with what I would say is high traffic (1000+ active concurrent users daily), and moderating that felt like a full-time job, and I had appointed like 10 other moderators to help. I don't have time for that no more lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    That's what I mean though, terminally online mods ruin it for a lot of us. No way in hell do I have an hour or more a day to commit to policing others, yet there are mods on all social media that love to do it for free. When it's free you get a selection bias for motive. Not dissimilar to real world police.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    People with a very high sense of responsability towards others generally avoid taking on responsabilities were their own mistakes might cause problems to others - for them such positions are a "weight on their shoulders".

    People who seek power, on the other hand, generally tend to do it because of perceived social prestige or what they can do with that power. The less they feel that sense of responsabiliy to offset such attractive elements in having power the more they want power.

    This is a well known phenomenon: for example there are tons of sayings about how (political) power should be given to those who do not want it not those who want it, and there's actually a Harvard Business Review article from over a decade ago about how they investigated this in companies and found that companies where the CEO unexpectedly got the position rather than seek it, in average outperformed the rest of their industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago

    Yeee, I’m in this pic and I like it! Good job me 🫶

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago

    90% of my downvotes are unintentional. The other 10% are for people who use alternating case. I have half a mind to go downvote everything in this boring company community though, just for laughs.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    Thanks for the heads up I'm gonna go get banned from a shitty elon musk fan community. Badge of honor as far as I'm concerned

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't get it. Is he like... doing an Elon Musk impression...? Is this performance art...? I don't get it

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Rule #0.0
    Don't hurt moddy-woddy's fee-fees.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago*

    What do you expect from the mod of a grifting comm?

    You can't hang out in a shithole without getting a little shitty.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Wow, not even making up a lie, just straight up saying they're banning for down voting.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago*

    BRB, gonna downvote all his posts so I don't have to bother blocking that community.

    (I also blocked it anyway.)

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago

    Elmo fans are inevitably dickheads, so I'm not surprised in the slightest

    I blocked him immediately anyway

    I automatically block nazi apologists

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Many mods are completely powerless in their lives. Its why the become mods. To feel like they have some control over their lives. They don't. Just like the rest of us. The difference being they are mods and can push their pathetically limited power around. Just like some asshole on the highway who slows down when you can't pass and goes to warp when you can.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    You get similar "petty dictator" behaviors in other areas such as bouncers and police officers.

    Some people are little more than bitches of their own subconscious inferiority complexes.

    The other kind of will also calously fuck other up, Sociopaths (who seem to be present day society's natural winners), unlike these types don't do it because they feel the need to somehow prove their superiority over others, it's just because others stand in the way of their personal upside maximization and they simply don't care if other are hurt as long as they themselves gain from it, so they're actually very different from these petty dictator types.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    I remember blocking this account on my personal feed and wondering if I did so prematurely. I'm thinking I made the right decision at the right time.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    kind of the dark side of the reddits/lemmys. Mods just doing whatever they like. btw, fuck Elon musk, that guy sucks. and fuck threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works. What a snowflake douchebag.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Vote visibility is off by default (IIRC) on reddit so at least there folks wouldn't be banned just for downvoting someone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

    How do they even know you downvoted? I was banned from a carnivore's communities once and can't say I'd ever even seen them. Claimed I was committing "systemic downvoting." Even if I had, how would they know? I started some tiny little communities on another instance, just to learn really, and I have no such privied data available to me as a mod (at least not that I know of so far). I should have posted that weirdo.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Because community moderators can see upvotes and downvotes of comments and posts on their community. Anyone can as well with Lemvotes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    We can see exactly how each person votes? I'm on piefed.social too and must be staring right at the thing but not recognizing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Today I learned! I'm surprised, knowing what I know now, that I haven't been banned from more sublemmys. Ah, well. The day is young.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Well ultimately it doesn't happen that often across the Fediverse. Specific communities that are controversial are likely to take harder lines on it, and big communities just won't even notice it anymore. Like I only see this at all when its in reference to new and niche communities that, lets be clear, most users won't ever be interested in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Ngl seems like a boring community

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›