“Whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you die," Elon Musk told the large crowds at Saturday's “Unite the Kingdom” rally.

More than 100,000 people descended on Britain’s capital on Saturday for one of the country’s largest far-right rallies in decades.

The “Unite the Kingdom” rally was organized by Tommy Robinson, a convicted fraudster with a violent criminal record, and attended by billionaire Elon Musk via video link. Amid a sea of flag-waving and soccer-style chanting from large crowds that exceeded expectations, violent clashes with police led to dozens of arrests.

It came amid a surge of nationalism in the U.K., with a far-right party topping the polls, and the murder of American conservative activist Charlie Kirk — an assassination Robinson used to mobilize support in the run-up to the event.

all 76 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 97 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you.

From the even further right as it turned out.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 152 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Absolute fucking morons.

    Every single one of those people is going to end up in poverty as a direct result of who they want to elect.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 116 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The UK should issue an international arrest warrant for Elon Musk.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    We are so fucked. There is no escaping this global rush of extremism.

    I am originally from the states, but was lucky enough to move to Australia 11 years ago.

    I thought I escaped the growing right wing crazy, and watched from afar as Trump was elected the first time, and my country descended into fascism.

    Then here in Australia there was a white supremacist rally. Then another.

    Then in my city there was a "March for Australia" organised by known white supremacists, but claiming not to be racist.

    "They just don't want all this immigration".

    Their website also said they wanted remigration.

    Remigration is an originally European far-right proposal for ethnic cleansing via the mass deportation of non-white immigrants and their descendants, sometimes including those born in Europe, to their place of racial ancestry.

    Sounds pretty racist to me.

    This march was planned for the final day of the state multicultural festival. Its planned start and end point was the park where the festival was being held.

    My family and I decided we would go. I haven't been to a protest since I was a teenager, but I felt it was our duty to show that not everyone agrees with this.

    The day before the march our best friend said their friends were afraid to go out to lunch with them that day, because their parents were verbally assaulted in a grocery store on Friday for being immigrants.

    They later said people came to their parents house and were beating on the door and yelling about them being immigrants.

    My husband stood there in his suit, I stood in my pretty dress with flowers, our daughters held signs that said things like "so bad even the introverts are here".

    The March was not peaceful and was definitely racist. We started off to the side, sitting with flags my daughters and I made with hundreds of countries on them, and eventually we were swarmed as the crowd veered to come right past us.

    They screamed obscenities at us, pushed into me, pushed my husband, tried to rip the sign from his hands. They ripped down the flags we made. Blew an air horn in our faces.

    Many claimed they were not racist but my husband got called a f-ing Jew multiple times??? Maybe it was the beard and the hat, I don't know.

    Seemed pretty racist to me.

    Eventually police came and stood in front of us while we packed our things and left. We would do it again, in a heartbeat.

    Before the rowdy crowd came looking for trouble we had immigrants come up and thank us, hug us, and we want them to know that not everyone agrees with this march.

    Not wanting immigration is not what this march was about. This march was about fear and racism.

    I urge all of you, show up, make signs, show that not everyone agrees.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This is a very disheartening story. Do Australians realize anyone not brown isn’t indigenous to Australia?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The issue isn't that they don't want immigrants, or want immigration reform.

    The issue is that they literally want remigration (ethnic cleansing of all non whites) and were threatening and ugly.

    They chose to hold a protest on a day when families were out enjoying different cultures.

    They were violent towards me and my children and husband, and spouted bullshit American rhetoric while doing it.

    Claiming that they like immigrants, they just don't want illegal immigrants.

    Australia is an island! We lock up the immigrants who come by boat on an island! We don't have illegal immigrants!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I see DarkAri has deleted their comment, but I think it's important that everyone can see what was written.

    This is the kind of unhinged nonsense we are up against. Accusations and ramblings that aren't even relevant to my comment.

    The mass immigration has been by far the strongest reason that right wing politics became so popular. Dont delude yourself. The left fucked up. It's not right to force half the country to tolerate mass immigration just because you think you are smarter then them. That is the shit that ruined democracy. Most democratic things are not about what is right or wrong. If another citizen doesn't want to have a million Indians or muslims living in his hometown thats none of your business. It is his right to have a state that represents him so long as he isn't advocating to take away anyone's rights. You are lucky the Republicans are incredibly corrupt and stupid and are doing all the other things that the right hates,like censorship, taking away freedom, stuff like this. Your pathetic state is so desperate to micromanage everyone's lives and monitor them that they just cannot help themselves to not ruin their own position again. The racism is strong, but half of the reason people voted for the right is because they perceived the left as being the side of censorship and mass surveillance and fascism, but they are getting a wakeup call now. Lucky for you their politicians are incredibly stupid and also many people who are actually right wing do have some decent values and character and will reject the Republican politics completely for this bullshit they are trying to pull. Don't ever sell out your fellow citizens to the state and corporations again. We do not need them telling us what we can watch and read, and what we can vote on, we don't need them or you policing our speech. We are free people just like you, not subjects and not slaves. If the leftists can actually learn to take responsibility for their shitty tactics they might actually get power again. The day they stop trying to ignore half the country is the day they will start getting popularity again. After the 2016 election with Hilary it's pretty obvious how extremely corrupt they were, but now people are seeing how much more corrupt the right is. We got lucky this time but if the left doesn't wise up they are going to lose everything for a few decades until right wing politics become lame again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    We lock up the immigrants who come by boat on an island! We don’t have illegal immigrants!

    In a shop window in northern California, I recently saw a sign saying "nobody is illegal on stolen land."

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 60 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Britain must stand united

    Where almost half the flags are not Union Jack but the English flag. 🤣🤣🤣
    Such a bunch of morons.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    As i quoted before. Racists were never burdened with an over abundance of book learning

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    They say knowingly dumb things because only idiots will take them seriously. It weeds out the skeptics while pissing off the intelligent, who often get dismissive, which lets them continue growing their party.

    It’s like the Nigerian Prince scams, where bad spelling and grammar weeds out the people who wouldn’t fall for it anyway, but with the added bonus of pissing off opponents in the process.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I'd bet a few of those actually do want to exclude people from the other UK nations. Not as many as are flying the flags, I grant you, but nonetheless. Colonialist mindset still runs deep in some of the English.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yet Palestine protesters are arrested... What a sick joke.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Jesus Christ, same planet but different worlds. How does someone so hateful have so many fans?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Basically everyone living in capitalism without regulation has been slowly and systemically crushed over time and the capitalists (and other parties interested in destabilization) have done a good job at convincing them that it’s not in fact the capitalists but rather immigrants, minorities, women, etc etc That are at fault

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I think racism and tribalism is easy. It's the first thought of an uneducated person, it's base, it's instinct, and it feels good to follow through on any conviction. But most people had no good reason to he racist, you worked with a few migrants, the black guy at college was great, and Jackie Chan movies are great. Then the internet / bot farms / Russia came along, and fed the uneducated a constant steady stream of racist content. Couple that with the people who found politics too boring getting Donald Trump. And he's seen the racist bot farm content too! He just gets us! Bam, a recipe for disaster.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    People want validations and to believe what they are doing is the right thing. When one side calls them evil, far-right, and racists, naturally they will flock to the other side who are telling them they are heroes who are protecting the country from immigrants.

    You can watch street interviews of the protesters and you'll see what I mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    they were even doing it this past weekend here in Toronto, Canada. People marching and holding up posters of Kirk. was insane.

    Funny thing was seeing a bunch of POC among them and I'm thinking "you moronic motherfuckers, if the cops weren't here they'd turn on you without a moments hesitation."

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That or say “you’re alright for a black man”, which is just as fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Which translates to “even though I hate most people who look like you, I am surprised to find that you have a redeeming quality”

    I’m mixed race and I usually get asked which side I more like. Or a mind boggled “What ARE you?” - if I answer “Canadian” it makes them have to squirm around and say “no, not in that way”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Nazis made a martyr out of Horst Wessel. Republicans are trying to make a martyr out of Charlie Kirk.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    As an American, my message to my friends in Europe is, to paraphrase Musk: “Whether you choose Trumpian right wing thuggery and nationalism, it is coming to you. You either fight back or you die.”

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    here in the states younger patrons coming in the shop have said they related to him and are in mourning

    fucking nuts just yesterday a younger couple came in and was the first thing mentioned and was like what about his views on keeping women in their place or his other extreme owner class ideals and woman with him stayed very quiet and busied herself with petting the shop cat

    nothing but praise for the guy came from them or any other of most of the younger patrons and even the older crowd seems to be for him but the media is toxic and controlled as is all narratives even with education

    United States was never the United States for all of us here but feels like getting worse but want to keep being hopeful just challenging

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    A gathering of bell ends, as the Brits would say.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It’s crazy that people are claiming 3 million, I refuse to believe people are actually believing it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Stop the world, I want to get off this ride.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I hate that they use terms like this for their shit. “Unite the kingdom” is up there with “bring balance to the force”

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I am really, really happy that Britain left the EU.

    Sorry to any sane Brits, but the "ever more nuttier" European country not having any voting power in the EU, much less a veto, is a great thing.

    Mind you, lots of countries over here might end up like that, but Britain seems to be a decade ahead of the rest in that specific kind of shit show and it and the US might very well serve as a warning for the locals on this side of the Channel not to go down that route (just like the example of Brexit itself crushed any ideas about Leave Referendums in the rest of the EU).

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I mean it's pretty easy when you think about it. Like if the "far right" idea is a virus, the English language is it's vector of infection, making it easier for ideas or memes to cross pollinate cultural between the US and UK. Some of the other EU countries have their own main language after all other than English so such spread is slower.

    In his eyes, the greatest symbiotic parasite Men has ever known isn't microbial, it's linguistics. Words are what keeps civilization, our world alive. Save the world not by taking Men's lives but by taking their tongue.

    A wise philosopher once said, "it is no nation that we inhabit. Nay! Our native tongue is our true fatherland!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    And yet the Republic Of Ireland isn't at all aligned with Britain in this.

    Not that I disagree with you, more that I think that there's more than just that.

    I lived in a couple of places in Europe, Southern, Northern and also over a decade in Britain.

    IMHO, Britain has is very own cultural twists that make a certain kind of posh authoritarianism much more likely there: an incredibly entrenched dynastic elite (Britain has, I believe, the lowest social mobility in Europe) with a ton of structures to make sure it will always be so (the "public" schools -> Oxbridge -> daddy's friend's company "internship" path that makes sure the scions of the elites remain in that class, the Judiciary being almost entirelly in the hands of "public" school graduates even though they're only 11% of population which gets reflected in quite different legal outcomes depending on one's class, the The "Honors" System, the Lords with its inherited positions, and more).

    This elite has its own sub-culture (even including its own accent) which amongst other things is big on fakeness and very anti-empathy (I've personally known a handful of people from that section of society) and meanwhile the other end of society is also quirky as fuck, in a different way (amongst other things more violent and prejudiced than in other countries I lived in, hence things like the Hooliganism phenomenon).

    Then there are weird cultural postures than transverse society such as how people's approach to their position in the social ladder is to focus on keeping those below them where the are, rather than try and climb it themselves, plus there is a general tendency to worry too much (IMHO) about keeping up appearences (to "look right" rather than "be good") though it's worse the higher up the social ladder one is (working class are the most genuine, middle class tend to be pretty fake, upper class live their entire lives behind a façade - hence the whole "posh" thing).

    Mind you, in my experience this mostly applies to the English and those from other nations are less like that, especially the Scotts.

    (I fully support the idea of an Independent Scotland in the EU)

    Anyways, my point is that Britain has it's own set of wierd quirks, which mixed with the shit imported from the US (IMHO, Brits seem to in the last couple of decades somehow have combined the worst of both cultures rather than the best) yields this "Rocketship to Posh Fascism" effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Why Elon is not arrested for supporting terrorism is beyond me.

  • source
  • [+] -31 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    Right wingers in Europe are becoming more and more radicalised. I can see it everywhere but EU has itself to blame due to its failed immigration policy particularly from Africa and middle East.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Congratulations on buying the propaganda you absolute chode of a human being. You're doing exactly what Elon and all these fucking idiots want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Here's a lesson you can learn, you want to be heard? Don't be a rude prick, I'm entitled to opinion as much as anyone. I'm actually pro migration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    You're entitled to an opinion. You're not entitled to be respected for it.

    Opinions precede action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Actually, opinions are the foundation of democracy and therefore must be respected always. You might not agree with someone's opinion but I'm not here to convince you otherwise. You are clearly here because your extremist voice and flagrant disrespect of anyone you disagree with stands in your own personal development. People like you are the reason the right wingers become more extreme. Proof of the matter is obvious everywhere in Europe. Politicians don't respect the wishes of the people who elected them. The EU has had an immigration problem for at least a decade , they are now electing extremist and populist politicians out of desperation that their voice isn't heard. Populist parties rise to power out of general unhappiness of the electorate, not the other way around.

    You might not like them, hell I certainly don't but you cant change the society in a few years, it takes decades, even hundreds of years. Feel free to drown yourself in the sorrows of your utopia when right wing nutters are being elected all around Europe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Opinions are the foundation of all ideologies. Hitler's opinions on undesirables for example.

    The reason right wingers become more extreme is because of allowing their opinion on violence go unchecked lets them begin to actually start practicing it. Even the Charlie Kirk killer was a Trumpist who thought Kirk was too much to the left.

    The issue in humanity has always been that the left has always only fought back once things become dire. They've only ever functioned as a check to a society's collapse rather than a deterrent to it's downward decline. If the left actually adhered to the paradox of intolerance, then society and humankind would progress much faster, because those who are a factual detriment to society - the greedy, the power hungry, the psychopathic - wouldn't be allowed to gain power, either permanently or through meaningful consequences.

    The issue is the left is inherently peaceful to a fault. They don't actually go out and start punching let alone killing until it's too late and they've literally been forced into it.

    It's also why rarely does violence actually permanently fix things - because those willing to do it usually want power rather than justice, and even if that is the case, it does not remain permanent policy.

    But then, being reactionary rather than preventative to threats has always been the greatest fault of humanity, but especially the left. Not being aggressive with aggressors early on, not dealing with climate change until it's kinda too late, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    And democracy is an ideology that we are supposed to follow. That ideology comes mostly in the form of representative democracy where you elect someone that is supposed to represent your group.

    You don't know if Tyler Robinson is left or right , that is all media speculation at this stage. As someone that lived behind the iron curtain, the concept that left is inherently peaceful is complete nonsense. Neither left or right is inherently violent or peaceful. Violence of the far left and far right is always a result of someone who thinks their ideology is superior, disregards all moral grounds, and forces their will and/or dogma on somebody else. Leninist-Marxist, PLO, Earth Liberation Front, too many examples to list. I do agree that the left is generally less violent today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    As someone who lived behind the iron curtain, you may not realize this, but people lie.

    Something or someone calling itself leftist does not mean it is. The USSR pretending to have been socialist is about as authentic as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea being a democracy.

    Earth Liberation Front is about the most violent actual leftists example you listed, and even they pale in comparison to what the right wing does, and is again an appropriate response mechanism for permanently altering the climate of the entire planet in a devastating way for the fictional concept of money we have collectively decided to value. If anything, again proving my point of too little too late when you consider the consequences, and considering they formed back when there was acid rain literally happenings due to pollution.

    The right is inherently violent because it's an ideology of power and authority, not union and equality. Belief in power and authority is inherently violent, because subjection of humans goes against the inherent will of personhood, and will inevitably lead to conflict. The pursuit of power is also inherently violent, because it requires therefore forceful subjection. That's why all authoritarian governments are right wing.

    I can think of only one example in recent human history that broke that mold - only one dictator that, as far as I know, sought power solely for the purpose of improving their country and the lives of people while eliminating corruption, that being Lee Kwan Yu. They were the closet I've seen to an actual violent leftist ideology, and their governmental system remains an outlier in that it's a democratic competitive authoritarian system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Thanks for proving all my points. In one paragraph you justify left wing violence as long as the cause is honourable, and in another paragraph, you claim the eastern block socialists as not really left wing.

    I've got some news for you. They were as left wing and as forceful as they come. You didn't own property , everything was state owned, society was very progressive (abortions were legal - ex USSR , socialised medicine, free schooling all the way to getting a job, gender equality, LGBT rights were a lot further than in the west).

    Conservatism/right-wing is not inherently violent, that's fodder. Some societies are more conservative than others. There are even right wing libertarians. It becomes evil when it seeks to impose its will over minorities or majorities, and in effect invalidate their voice. There are many examples of this from the left and the right (more right for sure).

    If you are not a centrist, you are a dogmatic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Everything being state owned isn't leftist, at all. That's straight up authoritarian. Putin has almost everything owned by the state too - are you seriously going to call him a leftists??? Sprinkling in some civil rights so the state machine runs better does not a leftist state make. And actual libertarianism is solidly center neutral. Right wing libertarianism is an oxymoron.

    But, there's no point in discussing the situation further with someone who still has past traumas from an authoritarian regime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    State ownership of means of production is the very definition of state socialism, thus removing power from the capitalists, which is strictly an implementation of the leftist ideology. I have no trauma, I just don't live in a lala land. I'm sure you spend a great amount of time thinking about what society could be, instead of accepting what it is and dealing with it. Libertarianism, centrist? Oh please. Its very foundation is rooted in anarchist concepts, distinctively left wing ideology.

    I agree there is no point discussing things any further. Just keep dreaming of your utopia, eventually you will grow up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    State ownership of means of production is the very definition of state socialism

    Except there's also state capitalism. The bloc may have been started with the intention of state socialism (doubtful, since we're talking about Stalin here), but it was definitely run as a state capitalist system, as most authoritarian governments do - including modern Russia.

    Libertarianism, centrist? Oh please. Its very foundation is rooted in anarchist concepts

    Just because something is rooted in concepts that might be left (or right) wing, doesn't mean the thing itself is at the same level (much like Stalinism).

    Libertarianism itself is strongly center.

    It's offshoots, like Libertarian Socialism, are what's left or right wing ideology.

    Again, you don't actually know your politics, instead shaping your perception on things based off experience, not what they really are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    That's just not true. They are radicalized by lies, propaganda and the hate spread by right wing grifters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    This is not a chicken and egg problem. Extremists are a result of society's ailments, not the other way around. . I'll give you a few examples from the 20th century.

    • Hitler - became leader of Germany because of the impact WW1 had on German society
    • Al Queda/ISIS - got into position of power due to the suppression of moderate leaders by authoritarian regimes ie. Taliban.
    • IRA - the discrimination of Irish Catholics by the British-protestant colonialist.
    • Khmer Rouge - got into power due to Vietnam war bombing of Cambodia.
    • Kokutai - the perceived betrayal by the west after WW1 (yes Japan fought against Germany in WW1), lead to the rise of extremist ideologies which supplanted Japan's desire to fight against the West.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sure, but the ailment of our time is not immigrants. It's wealth inequality, it's 1% enriching themselves at the expense of everyone else, it's unchecked self-destructive capitalism.

    Rich people are the problem, not immigrants. And it's lie and propaganda that drove people to believe otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    That is true about the state of capitalism today. However, you choose not to see the relationship between the inherent nature of human tribalism, which is as old as humanity itself, and seeing a large influx of aliens in your tribe, as part of that same tribal nature. If you want to change the human nature, you will require a long time, if it's at all possible. The left, just like the right, gets caught up in the cycle of "we have power, we can do everything we want, and we want do it now" when these deep societal changes require very long time to be implemented peacefully, perhaps the length of a life time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    got into position of power due to the suppression of moderate leaders by authoritarian regimes ie. Taliban

    The Taliban came long after Al-Qaida and had very similar ideology. They were organised and funded by the Pakistani security service, the IIS. The original Taliban groups were Pakistani seminary students harassing the less backward elements of Pakistani society. The movement was later spread to Afghanistan. And the Taliban were allied with Al-Qaida, never attempted to suppress them. Some other Middle Eastern governments tried to suppress them (Saddam's Iraq, successfully; Egypt's corrupt military junta, far less so). The Taliban hosted Al-Qaida fighters and training camps, and elements of the Pakistani military provided Bin Laden with safe haven on a military base.

    Al-Qaida started as a Wahhabi-based xenophobic movement to purge Saudi Arabia of Western influence. The Wahhabi movement itself was a fanatical Sunni movement founded over 200 years ago with the intent to exterminate non-Sunni Muslims and non-Muslims. The Saudi and Qatari royal families are Wahhabi. The former from a more virulent faction than the latter.

    Anyway, that's just one of your bullet points dismantled. In general, the idea that every group of extremists was somehow inevitably caused by some kind of social upheaval or injustice is simplistic and has no predictive value.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Furthermore, while not every extremist group formed because of society ailments it is** a well known factor recognised by scholars*.

    There is robust evidence that radicalisation is a social process and that identity is a key factor in why individuals become involved in violent movements. In conflicts involving violent extremism (as opposed to terrorism directed against the West), socio-economic discrimination and marginalisation do help to explain why extremist groups are able to recruit support in large numbers (Allan, Glazzard, et Al. 2015)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Sorry the inclusion of Taliban was a mistake, was typing too quickly. What I meant to say was the Afghan Marxist government .

    Studying the history of al-Qaeda is a key to understanding the ideology and even the mentality of the movement as a whole. It began in Afghanistan in 1979 in response to the introduction of Soviet troops into the country, which caused an influx of foreign fighters from all over the Islamic world. > (Vasiliev & Zherlitsyna, 2023)

    Why did the Soviets invade Afghanistan?

    In April 1978 Afghanistan’s centrist government, headed by Pres. Mohammad Daud Khan, was overthrown by left-wing military officers led by Nur Mohammad Taraki. Power was thereafter shared by two Marxist-Leninist political groups, the People’s (Khalq) Party and the Banner (Parcham) Party—which had earlier emerged from a single organization, the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan—and had reunited in an uneasy coalition shortly before the coup. The new government, which had little popular support, forged close ties with the Soviet Union, launched ruthless purges of all domestic opposition, and began extensive land and social reforms that were bitterly resented by the devoutly Muslim and largely anti-communist population. > (Encyclopaedia Britannica , 2025)

    The aim of the Soviet operation was to prop up their new but faltering client state

    There you go.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Right wingers in Europe are becoming more and more radicalised

    I'm not sure about more radicalised, but they're more evidently centrally organised, well-funded, emboldened and numerous. Like a plague of fucking locusts. There's serious money coming in from other countries to fan these flames. Don't pretend this is a spontaneous expression of anything, it's a fucking rent-a-crowd. I've seen the ones in my city in England. They were all bussed in.

    EU has itself to blame due to its failed immigration policy particularly from Africa and middle East.

    You make it sound as if those hooligans are voicing legitimate grievances. That's no more the case than saying the same about Krstallnacht. The arseholes in London were marching in favour of burning women and children in refugee hostels.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The UK can get away with fascism because no one there has a gun to stop it

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments