top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

Those two things are very different in sustainability.

Including gas as a renewable makes that classification worthless.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Good news on nuclear, awful news on gas, but considering the German fake energy transition is powered by it, it's perhaps inevitable.

    Also this just annoyed me more than it should:

    Nuclear power is a carbon-free source of electricity but it is not typically labeled as green energy, like solar, wind and other renewables. Generating power this way requires mining and processing uranium to create nuclear fuel, an energy-intensive process that produces emissions.

    Unlike wind turbines and solar panels, which are made from butterfly shine and faery sighs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    4 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I agree with nuclear (somewhat), but gas is just stupid.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Have they been talking to Peter Dutton this resds like something he would pull.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Guess they never heard of klean koal

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    This is just ridiculous, completely insane.

  • source