1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago
15 comments in c/android@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 34 points 1 year ago

fair it was basically worthless

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    It was stupid from day one. 🤷

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I don't really like it when they kill things but to be fair I had literally never heard of this. I don't think its going to be a big loss.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What was that instant app?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Did anything ever come of Apple's weird Instant Apps clone, where you had to scan a QR code in a Starbucks or whatever? 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    App Clips. I’ve used these several times to pay for meals at restaurants. Those use Local for Toast. QR code on bill. Scan it. Check the items. Add the tip. Pay with Apple Pay. I eventually installed the app, but I think it still uses the clip interface instead of opening the app. Did it for parking once too, different app. My local Sunoco also has App Clip tags at the pumps, but I don’t need those. Definitely a self-serve deal in my experience. I’d see more if I went out more often.

    https://support.apple.com/guide/iphone/use-app-clips-iphb3a73ec53/ios

  • source
  • parent
  • Not gonna lie, I didn't even know this was a thing.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Does anyone know an example of an instant app? I’d like to see what this is before it gets shut down.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I just tried a bunch of apps that I swear used to have it, it all of them just say "Open in the real app" now. I wonder if low usage here also means developers stopped using them.

    Basically what would happen is you'd click a link to Instagram, and instead of opening a web page, it would open the Instagram "app" instantly. If you then tried to do anything more advanced in the app (advanced decided by the developer) it would prompt you to install the app.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    @Skyline Lime had it (probably still has it). I used to rent a Lime scooter just by choosing "try app". I would then enter the scooter code manually, and I could freely ride how much I wanted. It worked all the time. I'm no longer using this feature, as I have a new phone with a bigger storage, where I installed the Uber app, so whenever I would try the same way it would prompt me to use the Uber app to unlock the scooter.@fne8w2ah

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    11 comments in c/android@lemdro.id view that post
    [–] 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    ... I literally used this for the first time today. Sorry everyone!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    So how the OS already catches links to e.g. YouTube and offers to open it directly in the app, it could also do that for apps that weren't installed and it'd just download and run them automatically. One of the examples was Vimeo, instead of loading the website it'd download a cut down variant of the normal app and load the video in that instead.

    The idea was to push people towards using apps instead, but now Google control the web they can just make that their app store instead, so native apps aren't as relevant anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Good. Always seemed like a potential security risk.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Good it was a dumb idea.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Happy cake day and thanks for all your contributions here.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Not surprising, most of them were just web wrappers, anyway. I've not used them that often, but they feel like they're basically just bloatier PWAs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Any app can be a bloated web page with or without pwa.

    Instant apps were a really cool concept that never got traction because documentation was negative - those cases where every single bit of information you find, most of it is outdated and the updated one, if exists, is not to be found.

    Many times since the beta release I had discussions about these, and I've known people seasoned in Android native trying to pull off a basic proof of concept and unable to get started.

  • source
  • parent