all 86 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 58 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    If you think Greg Abbott isn't chomping at the bit to take over Houston municipal government and have all the local elected officials ejected, you haven't been paying attention to Texas politics in at least ten years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Fyi, that isn't the standard across the English speaking world and never heard champing before being on this website.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Champing was the standard (even if you'd never heard it) and now it isn't. Chomping is an accepted version of the phrase now. Language in the act of changing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's at least a 40 y/o change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Sure, at least. I remember reading "champing" in the phrase (in books that were at least decades old by then) as a yout and questioning whether that was a typo or a mistake because I was certain I'd heard it as "chomping" when someone spoke it. My english teacher stated more and more people used "chomping" and it wasn't necessarily wrong. That was in the late 70's. I am olde and get offa my lawn.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What’s the per capita rate?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [M] 49 points 1 year ago*

    Hey, we got some troll baiting going on in this thread. Don't fall for it. If you start to feel angry, that's the point.

    Go after the idea, not the user.

  • source
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    It blows my mind how US americans just accept that they are having such a high murder rate at all. The murder rate in San Francisco is still too high, if you compare it with other nations and their cities. Considering how much surveillance and how much money their government pumps in the police system… you would think they finally would wake up and find out that all those measures are only in place to protect the capital of the ruling class and not the citizens…

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    It blows my mind how US americans just accept that they are having such a high murder rate at all.

    Genuine question (for you or anyone else with the same mentality): what would you do? Everyone on this website talks about how weird Americans are for just "being ok with everything going on" when in fact most of us aren't and have practically no ability to do anything about it that doesn't result in our own immediate death.

    Besides, "amass enough capital (in a system designed to prevent you from amassing capital) to leave this shitty country", what would you actually do? Since it's mind blowing that we're not doing it and all...

    (Sorry if this comes across as angry or directed at you, it's frustrating to live in a dumpster fire and read comments all day from people not in the dumpster fire implying that I'm just totally ok with said dumpster fire.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    There are multiple factors contributing to high murder rates:

    • Guns: ban them.
    • Mental health: provide free support for mental health issue, including a phone number where people can safely report friends and relatives in crisis. Today if you report, they send police officers totally untrained and unprepared for these situations and that easily ends up in drama
    • Gangs: a lot of the murders are gang members against gang members. There is no miraculous solution to that. But I would advocate: decriminalize possession of small amounts of drugs, provide shooting rooms with support (both physical and mental) freely available. I would even support offering drugs substitutes for free under control. If the drug price collapses, their business collapses.

    So: vote for someone who will support social science based policies.

    I'm sorry there are no easier way. "Get tough on crime" is the solution that was experimented the most and has proven again and again to be inefficient.

    Edit: you may already be doing that, don't take this as an assumption you don't. I understand the frustration and that feeling of being powerless while people ask you "why aren't you DOING something about it?".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    As an individual: Definitely leave. Generally I think some people ought to shut up and get the hell out instead of impotently complaining online.

    I think what these posters are asking about, though, is how it is possible that the American people in aggregate support this system? And they do. Just like how about half of Israelis support Netanyahu. Sure sure. Electoral college, voting system, bla bla. Trump won the popular vote against Harris. How? This is clearly an electorate that itself is the problem. The people of the US doesn't suffer under its government. The people of the US suffers because it chooses to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Leave to become an immigrant in another country that ends up deporting us?

    Using all this money that we don't have?

    Bringing our direct family with us, tearing them away from friendships and other family?

    Cool idea

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I see you want to live in the US after all. Valid thing to do. But don't complain about the consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    you act as if leaving a country like the US, and emigrating to another is that easy? its not the EU where you can move much more freely in the continent. cultural, financial, language barriers exists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Yeah, the 32 of 827k population SF is pretty damn awful when compared to the 54 of 6m population Denmark or the 13 of 1.4m population Copenhagen..

    One of a million pieces of data pointing at the fact that surveillance and law enforcement is NOT how you bring down crime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm going to make an educated guess at two big reasons as to why the US has a much higher murder rate compared to other wealthy nations: guns and income inequality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Could really see Newsom becoming president of the future New California Republic. Not saying I like that future. But I am starting to see it how it could come to pass

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Wait at first everyone mostly libs hated Newsom now he is making fun of Trump and now y’all taking him serious ? Dems party is dead with no leader for the next decade!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Nah, libs adore him and always have. That's how he gets elected.

    Those of us on the actual LEFT who're paying attention to his policies and other actions that aren't pure PR gimmicks and "sounds good on the surface" never could stand him, though, and would be enormous hypocrites to applaud his fighting gerrymandering with gerrymandering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I'm not sure why you're getting downvoted (there are deleted child comments so maybe that's where the issue lies), you're pretty spot on. When I was less politically educated (I don't pretend to be the most informed now) and considered myself a liberal I was pretty cool with Newsom. Never looked into much of his policies but the headlines usually phrased things in a way that aligned with my ideals at the time so I was ok with him. Now that I'm a good deal older and pay a bit more attention to things I think he's a complete tool, but in a freak scenario where Trump gets elected for an illegal 3rd term and goes full dictator and Newsom successfully secedes California from the US, California is the obvious option.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Perhaps. California has loads of money and access to lots of technological infrastructure. They could potentially seize tech companies' operations and deprive the rest of the country of things like their Gmail, YT access, operating systems, etc. GDP is very translatable to power imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Did they really take artistic liberties to make the Bay Bridge coloration look like the Golden Gate?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    At least it has a picture that is somewhat recognizable, Houston just has a guy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Seems to? That's their entire MO: lie about shit to make Republicans look less terrible at governing

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yeah if it makes 'them' look bad, that's something to bury, but if they can make the democratic party look bad...let's do it! Hypocrisy is their jam. Now I'm getting Austin Powers recently thawed scene in my head, hypocrisy isn't my jam....one book by Republicans, hypocrisy is my jam...baby. Okay well I'll take it to move things along.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    And I just went to look up the homicide numbers for Philly out of instinct. 262 last year.. Which is 36% less than the previous year. And still higher per capita than Houston.

    Go birds!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I’d argue about per capita but nobody who sees this cares about that.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I mean...

    A population of 873,965 in San Fran vs 2,304,580 in Houston.

    1 in ~25,000 people in San Fran get murdered vs 1 in ~7,150 people in Houston. That's ~3.5x higher. Per capita isn't helping much here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I’m not saying SF is more dangerous. I’m just saying people are idiots who don’t understand statistics. Which is what got us into this mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    The idea that a Democrat might have done wrong is more important than the reality that a Republican definitely did wrong.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    The unfortunate part about real life is that republicans just think democrats are lying about those numbers. They make up whatever stats they need in order to do what they want. Also, Houston has a democratic mayor. So they would probably blame him got the crimes.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    There's no such thing as a "Republican state," nearly every state is split somewhere between 51/49 and 60/40. There are "Republican-run states," but inside every Republican-run state is a "Democrat-run city" which has been a convenient narrative for Republicans of late. Houston's mayor is a Democrat, and Harris county has more registered Democrats than Republicans; in 2024 metro Houston voted for Kamala over Trump.

    Whether Abbot or Whitmire is more to blame for Houston's violence is just a political distraction. Both bear some responsibility and I'm tired of both sides running finger-pointing narratives rather than trying to find constructive solutions.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The murder rate in the USA, for a supposed 1st World civilized country is fucking pathetic. Life is cheap in the USA. The labor laws and healthcare system stress out society and one has nothing to lose. Yes, the Red Run Oblasts have plenty of violent crime and gun related deaths.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    its designed that way, so the "oligarchs can stay rich more easier and not get taxed. Poor education, poor healthcare, breeds cannon fodder for the military, and for profit prisons, which apparently, prisoners are used as part of the census for gop states.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Let's see, Houston has ~4X the population and ~10x the murders. So unless that equation is known to be non linear, that seems pretty bad Mr abbot

    Mr abbot: who gives a fuck about brown people?!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    What the hell is Abbott supposed to do about it? Send in the state guard?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    How about calling a special session to get the legislators to use state state money to address the root causes like systemic inequality against poor brown people? You know, an empathetic human approach?

    But of course he's a republican and so only has a flaming ball of tar where his soul should be, so that's never going to happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [+] 38 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's silly, the community allows any tweets except international politics. So it will just be overrun by US tweets.

    Make it easy on yourself, just block the community. US Defaultism doesn't go away

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe you could make your own Internet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -21 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Cars are actually a bigger threat than guns in San Francisco. There were 41 traffic fatalities last year, and on average traffic violence seriously injures 8 people each day. I suspect the situation is similar in Houston.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    gun culture isnt a thing in sf, but the amount of car collision related death is very high. alot of people dont know how to drive, many are drunk, or on thier phones. i think last year, alone on one stop a driver end up killing a bunch of people on a bus stop on a public transit hub.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    It's called overreporting.

    Make more than one report on the same one crime, so people will think it's multiple different crimes.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    this is what right wingers actually believe in general, they believe its higher because of gun control.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Wait, they're biased, and constantly lie? Huh. We should tell everyone, that'll fix it.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Westmob and Big Block got a truce on or something?

  • source