all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

i get why they would want to upgrade helicopters, but why would anyone want to embarrass defence planes?!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Money that could be spent actually improving the lives of the people of this country.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    We've had enemy vessels in our waters in the past, the Germans sunk multiple vessels in our waters during the war, and the way things are going, I can see similar shenanigans happening again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But if that is the case, a couple of new helicopters isn't going to help. Any potential invader that wants to take NZ is likely going to have a much stronger force than we can muster. That's why we traditionally have relied on our allies for military strength.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I'm sure there's a mention in flight of the conchords that NZ's tanks are just donated old UK planes that don't fly anymore.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, I'm embarrassed - but more about our government and multiple iterations of it having completely shortsighted approaches to just about everything

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I wonder how many inter-islanders we could buy

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The boats were only going to be $550 million each.

    Three billion would probably have gotten two boats, and one terminal they can actually park at.

    Which is a problem, as you need two.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    You're right, that was the whole contract.

    Which makes it even more impressive the project was set to be more than a billion over the original estimate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I dunno, I think cutting your losses and starting over when you're dealing with a shitshow on this scale is pretty sensible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Not if there are immense costs associated with cutting the project.

    Nothing this government has done has been sensible or based on logic or fiscal calculations. It's all based on ideology and the will to humiliate the previous government in any way they can and of course to suppress opposition from any quarter.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Seahawks and A320 series jets, both great choices.

    The Seahawk is from the same family as the Black Hawk, an aircraft type operated all around the world, and the A321 is part of a family of jets operated by airlines globally, probably thousands in operation around the globe.

    Both aircraft types are very popular, and operated by our allies, meaning manufacturer support should continue for decades into the future.

    I think that, long term, this will represent a cost saving over trying to keep the ageing aircraft we currently have in service.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Oh no, embarrassing.

    Grow up.

  • source