all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 82 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Particle man, particle man. Clocking your ass like only wifi waves can.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    is it illegal? it's not important. particle man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Fucking prophetic. FYI it's impossible to feel depressed while listening to Birdhouse in your Soul.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Big TMBG fan here, a friend of a friend runs a pretty cool TMBG blog if you're interested https://www.kissmesonofblog.com

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well I'll be damned. The internet is not dead. Now we just need like an indexing service that helps us search and find all these amazing sites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    At the least, add it to the Wayback Machine / Internet Archive and then throw them a dollar or a hundred, whatever you can. Not only do we need (new) indexing that isn't AI, but we need to make sure the best parts of the Internet don't disappear

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Non techie people are simply still below the "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." point, so that explains why imo. To them you are someone complaining about evil wizard conspiracies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I’ve been seeing research on this for a few years now, crazy it’s come this far. You can track the movement of people in a home pretty accurately using WiFi like a radar

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yep. It's also possible to fingerprint people's body signatures and reconstruct poses.

    9 Years ago | 3 Years ago

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    This is yet another reason to own (or better yet, build your own) router.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You have to go further.

    If you don't fab your chips yourself, you are letting the authoritarian regimes in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    There’s making a good effort, and there’s perfect acting as the enemy of good.

    If you repurpose an old thin client, install an old enterprise NIC, and slap pfSense or opnSense on it, it’s gonna be a damn sight better in terms of corporate infiltration and co-opting of your infrastructure that whatever Comcast rents to you. That’s all I’m saying, and that’s how I run mine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nah, gotta grow and dope your own silicon to be sure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    This is why you run your AP's with openwrt.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Well, I'm glad they have figured out how to block WiFi signals from leaving your house and detecting your neighbours if you live in an apartment or terrace........

    This is another Pandora's box moment I think. I kinda was enjoying walls still being somewhat effective privacy guards

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I think there is actually some anti-wifi paint. Though I am pretty sure it would only work well if you also paint the floor and ceiling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    You’re thinking to small. You must get several extremely powerful emitters and simply jam up the wavelengths that wifi operates at for the entire block. Ideally you have them emit in a way that anyone trying to track your movement and position with it instead just get a dancing 3d model of some character.

    Concealment isn’t enough, you must asset electromagnetic dominance over your neighborhood.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Okay, well I needed an excuse to hire an electrician and rewire sound outlets, but if they can install Ethernet ports and I don’t have to deal with anything like this shit I’ll be happier.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's not just your wifi, it's any wifi. Best start building a Faraday cage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Recent research paper that I assume this is based off of: https://arxiv.org/html/2507.12869v1

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    By leveraging non-visual biometric features embedded in Wi-Fi CSI, this study offers a privacy-preserving and robust approach for Wi-Fi-based Re-ID, and it lays the foundation for future work in wireless biometric sensing.

    how the fuck would this make it privacy preserving?? who are these lieing to, themselves, policymakers, or the general public?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    D all of the above. Probably comes from a narrow conceptualization of privacy that ends at "do you know what my privates look like", maybe stretching to "can you listen to me orgasm". It wasn't specifically the intent of the piece, but I remember when Last Week Tonight did a bit about data collection exposed by Snowden and demonstrated that Joe Public doesn't conceptualize the loss of privacy well until it is placed in the context of "private parts"/peeping tom behavior, at least in the US context

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Straight evil.

    And even dumber to boot!

  • source
  • Cool, now we can find all the invisible people living in our homes! /s

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    This is why I never interested with technological advancement and innovations in the past decade. Sure a lot of it are technically cool, I maybe even want to play around or even tinker (if accessible) with some of them.

    But not for them to constantly make me consume all of those things or for them to use it malicously to people.

  • source