Sniper pointing rifle "People realizing it's time to join mastodon" at the failing spy "Bluesky trying to pull another fast one on their userbase"

top 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 48 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [+] 27 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Are there any other instances of BS though? My understanding was that it's too costly to host so there's only the official one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If you get banned on mastodon, you can’t move your followers to another server

    This actually depends. Mastodon has several ways of 'banning' a users, and apparently 'frozen' users can migrate their followers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Can someone please explain?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    The good news here is that Bluesky has made enormous progress in true federation. The cost of operating a full Bluesky stack has fallen from tens of millions of dollars per year to tens of dollars per month

    Great!

    But Bluesky, the company, still needs serious work.

    As things stand, Bluesky has very bad terms of service that every user who creates an account has to subject themselves to. In particular, Bluesky's ToS contain a "binding arbitration" waiver that forces users to surrender the right to sue Bluesky no matter how the company harms them. This is so pro-enshittificatory, it's like a landing strip for the sole use of Enshittification Airlines, which can land a 747 full of enshittfying nonsense on Bluesky's users every 10 minutes, around the clock, without worrying about any legal repercussions.

    This is less great.

    Edit: Wait, what?

    The new waiver says that you don't have to arbitrate for "claims that fraud, criminal misconduct, or gross negligence by Bluesky caused death or personal injury." That sounds good! It also sounds like everything that someone might sue Bluesky for, leaving me to wonder what Bluesky will make you arbitrate for.

    What's more, if the point of a binding arbitration waiver is to reduce nuisance suits and threats, this completely nullifies that tactic, because all a nuisance litigant has to do is claim that they are suing because of "fraud, criminal misconduct, or gross negligence," and Bluesky is back in court.

    I'm more confused now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Definitely important to look at, but also pretty industry standard. These texts are legal protections so they cover literally everything, even if a lot of those wouldn't hold in court.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    So I'm guessing their going to allow more cuckservatives on there huh? It's funny how truth social was never considered too right wing

    We need to make mastodon/pixedfed and lemmy easier to understand for the masses

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Someone got banned for saying rude things towards JKR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Bluesky? More like Blu Spy

    *laugh track*

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I said months ago, on Bluesky no less, that it would eventually travel down the same route Twitter did. Said enjoy it while it lasts but eventually it's inevitable that bluesky will just be twitter from years ago. And they're traveling that route in record time.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Bluesky/at protocol is the future. Activepub is going to die . I can gurrentee

  • source