"It's for the safety of the consumer." is such a bullshit excuse to strongarm people into a subscription model.
post
Is it GE? I'll bet you it's GE.
Clicks.
Yep, it's GE.
Great short story called Unauthorized Bread about this bullshit.
Can you imagine how ridiculous that story would have sounded 15, maybe even 10 years ago? Went into it thinking it would be way over the top, read along thinking, yeah, I could see that.
Yeah, its really fucking depressing. BUT, the solapunk/diy/foss/fediverse gives me hope that it can be bypassed or fought against. I find myself holding onto older tech and self hosting more and more. I am sure it makes me insufferable but I don't worry about my stuff disappearing or costing me more to use once I have it.
Damn. The fact KitchenAids DNS blocked her results for a workaround is sad and funny.
Won't be buying one of those fridges.
There are still plenty of top-freezer refrigerators with no water dispenser, ice maker or filtration available and those fell out of style decades ago - despite being ~20% more energy efficient than bottom freezer refrigerators. They’re not going away anytime soon.
I will learn how to build my own refrigerator before submitting to this IoT bullshit.
I'll just return to tradition and dig a root cellar.
Surely anyone could just not have a fridge, don't buy things that require it.
I discovered this when I put a reverse osmosis system in and wanted to bypass the filter. I needed a $50 plastic plug with an RFID tag in it or else the fridge refused to dispense.
For anyone with one of these GE fridges. If you read the fine print in the owner's manual, they will send you a bypass plug for free (just once) if you call and ask for one. You will need to provide the serial number of the fridge.
I'm moving to a place with well water, how difficult was it to install reverse osmosis and hook it up to the fridge? Does yours just provide for the fridge or the whole house?
I have an RO system that feeds a separate spigot at my kitchen sink and my refrigerator. Installing it is really simple because it just uses sharkbite connectors that just push to connect. Later on, I added a water heater so that I could have on demand hot water at the spigot which is also nice.
I have a separate filter that takes care of my whole house but that is just a carbon filter meant to scrub out the chlorine (I'm on city water) . Installation for that took a lot more effort and planning.
It’s just a small under-counter system that’s only running to the fridge and a separate spigot at the sink to fill pots with, etc. it was simple to install since my existing tap had enough pressure to push through all of the filters. I’ve never heard of whole-house RO, I think that would use a TON of water and you would definitely need a pump (in addition to a large storage tank).
Water dispensing is the main cause of refrigerator breakage. No water dispenser, fridge will work for decades.
Yup. My old-ass refrigerator has them.
But the thing is, I already had a Brita pitcher and ice trays. I don't need the fridge to dispense them.
Our house came with brand new appliances and the fridge has a filter. Thankfully ours doesn’t stop you from dispensing ice or water when it wants you to change the filter. It just has a red light telling you to change it.
My tap already dispenses water, why would I need a fridge to do that?
It dispenses filtered water, useful if you don't have the possibility to install a water filter faucet and prefer to filter water.
Can't force you to anything, if you weren't told about it before you bought it. Demand a refund and give them a date they get it out of your place by.
Rossmann and his ilk are who we need in Government. It seems so simple. Understands law, fights for the people.
I thought I fooled the fridge makers. I bought a model without filtered water. Sadly, I didn't realize that the ice cubes require a filter. 😔
Weird, I bought a high end GE fridge 2 years ago and it doesn't require drm on the water filter.
You know that you can also get water from the sink....
It would be illegal to explain how this is relevant, but it would be impossible to prevent Bitcoin double spending without access to the shared ledger.

all 53 comments