top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

To be clear, they're cutting an extra $9.4 Billion in services. Maybe it's used differently in British English but in the US "claw back" as an idiom generally refers to a win for an underdog party to keep something after a difficult fight, not a privileged party ending access to something.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Informed Americans are a threat to American conservatives and/or Republicans: it's best to keep them stupid.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    These people just suck. Public broadcasting provides so much to the communities they serve. I'm so angry, just everything that is remotely nice or helpful.

    I know that's the point. It just feels awful.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Obviously I hope PBS and NPR get all the funding they need, but maybe it would be better if it all came from listeners.

    Edit: to free them from being a political pawn. Not disputing the fact they're an essential service.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It does. In the form of taxes & donations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I meant they'd be a bit more free of political pressure if they weren't reliant on money from whoever's in power. Steve Inskeep was the first reporter I heard finally use the word "lie" to refer to something Trump said, but I'd like to widen the tightrope they walk. It would be even better if their funding was enshrined and guaranteed somehow, but I think we know that's impossible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Look at how much they actually get. This headline is disingenuous in the sense that they make it seem like pbs and npr are the majority of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Oh, I'm well aware (from listening to KCRW) it's only about 1.2 billion. A few wealthy individuals could make that up without a sweat, except they're mostly Wrong Wing and selfish af. I've already doubled my monthly donation, and many would, but will it be enough?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    9.4 Billion over what

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    We increased spending by about 1 TRILLION between military spending increases and tax reductions on the rich.

    That's the proportional equivalent of saying we increased spending by $10 and then saved 1 penny from gutting out public news funding that we all depend on for information.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    "claw back" steal, it's called stealing. And npr should take them to city under the ftca.

  • source