no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
63 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 149 points 1 year ago (1 child)

@DrunkEngineer A normal company fires its CEO and cleans house after something like that. Instead Tesla just offered him a big new compensation package to encourage him to stay and keep destroying their reputation and any shred of morality they may claim to have.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 223 points 1 year ago (32 children)

    Within about three minutes of the crash, the Model S uploaded a “collision snapshot”—video, CAN‑bus streams, EDR data, etc.—to Tesla’s servers, the “Mothership”, and received an acknowledgement. The vehicle then deleted its local copy, resulting in Tesla being the only entity having access.

    Holy fucking shit. What is the purpose of deleting the data on the vehicle other than to sabotage the owner of the vehicle?

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    That jumped out at me too. Giving the benefit of the doubt, it could be that this “snapshot” includes a very large amount of data that could be problematic if stored locally for longer. In reality, they probably do it this way for exactly this type of situation, so they can retain full control of the potentially-damning data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If they can transmit it, it is not a lot. It is that simple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nearly all of the vehicles have 4G/5G connectivity via AT&T. This isn't a dial up connection. They can transmit whatever the fuck they want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Mate, a 1 TB micro SD costs less than 100 $. How much does a high bandwidth high/no data limit 5G connection cost and how long would that need to actually transmit that much?

    What sensor data is there even supposed to be? Even at 1 millisecond resolution we are talking about megabytes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Bullshit. It was saved locally. It can stay saved locally but be marked for deletion if storage gets tight. This is a solved computer science problem.

    There is zero reason to delete it immediate except to cover their asses.

    If I was on the jury I'd be pushing for maximum monetary penalty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Agreed, if there was concern about the data falling into the wrong hands then there’s many different ways to secure the data (encryption w/ a secure enclave, masking, hardening) besides just deleting it. Tesla’s strategy here totally foregoes any typical data retention lifecycle like you mention, which is usually to delete old data that has little to no benefit besides just adding additional risk (e.g. trips older than 1 year or if there’s no space left). Plus you have to take into account the additional consequences you take on by deleting the data locally such as not being in compliance with regulations, and potentially risking sanctions or heavy fines.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    It is possible that the data is just never saved in non-volatile memory meaning that once power is lost that the values are also lost. In which case its not really deleting the information but rather just that information is just never intentionally saved.

    P.S. I am not a tesla fan boy just wanted to give this tiny insight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Forensic analysis managed to retrieve this data, so it must have been stored in non-volatile memory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Didnt the article say they retrieved the filename and hash, thus proving the existence of the crash diagnostic snapshot. After which Tesla handed over their copy?

    Or did the forensics retrieve the actual data?

    Edit: Given the importance of this type of data, not saving it to non-voletile memory is negligent at best. Even if it required a huge amount of space, they could delete unimportant files like the Spotify cache or apps or whatever

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    The article kind of fumbles the wording and creates confusion. There are, however, some passages that indicate to me that the actual data was recovered. All of the following are taking about the NAND flash memory.

    The engineers quickly found that all the data was there despite Tesla’s previous claims.

    ...

    Now, the plaintiffs had access to everything.

    ...

    Moore was astonished by all the data found through cloning the Autopilot ECU:

    “For an engineer like me, the data out of those computers was a treasure‑trove of how this crash happened.”

    ...

    On top of all the data being so much more helpful, Moore found unallocated space and metadata for snapshot_collision_airbag‑deployment.tar’, including its SHA‑1 checksum and the exact server path.

    It seems that maybe the .tar file itself was not recovered, but all the data about the crash was still there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    This explanation is completely fabricated, based on nothing, and nonsense.

    It is obviously critical data that nobody halfway competent would write to ram. Also video data is very large and makes no sense to store in ram.

    Furthermore the article says it was deleted and they later recovered it which would not have been possible with RAM

    Basically why are you pushing this drivel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    If the data is temporarily stored until it is transmitted and then is not considered to be needed anymore I see no reason as to why that would need to be stored locally forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Because it may not be possible to transmit depending on location. Also non violtile storage is cheap and fast and ram is normally limited

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Perhaps most importantly although we know it was not so lost because we read the article or at least the summary if it had been it would have been a deliberate design decision to have it be so.

    Your explanation doesn't wash in reality but it also doesn't wash even in theory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're also making assumptions in that the volatile memory lost power and thus must have been cleared at some point. I dont think there is a right or a wrong based on the knowledge i have I just am throwing out a random guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah, this is a good point. Also, another comment said it’s possible the data snapshot is very large, so it’s not intended to be stored locally.

    Either way, if you are sending data about my car to a server, it better be easy for me to get this data if needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Don't these keep a video record of every time a squirrel gets too close to the parked car?

    Another m.2 under the dash isn't going to kill the electric vehicles battery, this isn't an excuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago*

    Don’t these keep a video record

    those are saved on external drives. That being said, they could also have it set to save something like this to the external storage if it was too large for the internal memory as well.

    Videos aren't saved without the external drive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Hell, it could be that this is private information about the driver and the car's probably gonna end up in a Copart auction after insurance is done with it, so in a way they're protecting PII.

    Before anyone's gonna accuse me of Tesla fanboyism (I do make a lot of devil's advocate style comments), I've driven exactly one Tesla in my life, decided it's a piece of shit with a great powertrain and OK infotainment but absolutely lacking UX for drivers, and a ridiculously plain interior. I will never buy a Tesla unless it's a used Tesla S or X with a newish battery for 10k because at that price it'd just be the cheapest way to get a luxury EV lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 101 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You would think that’s a crime

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 98 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Folks. Publicly traded companies will ALWAYS compare the expected value of breaking the law with compliance.

    Say it costs $100 million to follow the law. Breaking it comes with a $300 million fine, but only a 20% chance of getting caught.

    They compare a 100% chance of paying $100 million to a 20% chance of paying $300 million.

    Average cost of following the law: $100 million

    Average cost of breaking it: $60 million

    If we're gonna do capitalism (which I would rather we not, for the record!), we have to make that expected value calculation break in favor of following regulations. If it is cheaper to break the law than to follow it, you're not just losing money by complying: you're giving ground to your competition. Fines need to be massive. Infractions need to get caught and punished. Executives need to be held personally accountable. Corporations need to be dissolved. Fines cannot be just the cost of doing business.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago*

    Do people need to (re)watch Fight Club?

    Narrator:

    A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside.

    Now, should we initiate a recall?

    Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X.

    If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

    It's been like 25 years.

    Did people like... genuienly not know this, forget about it?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The conditioning of people to think it must be monetary fines is strong I guess. Imo it shouldn't be a fine for intentionally breaking laws, especially when putting lives in danger. It should be jail time for the executives. Make the calculation disappear altogether.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I'd raise you in that. Companies are people now. If companies break laws, they should be held accountable personally. Even Club Fed would be misery for 14 years on a murder rap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I'd argue the entire C-suite should be legally responsible for anything the company does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The CEO in particular IMO, unless it's financial (CFO) or tech (CTO, CIO).

    However, it's already the CEO's job to take the heat in public so the board doesn't have to.

    Instead, hold everyone who holds a stake responsible, down to everyone with a 401k with 3 shares in the company for major violations.

    See how quickly the shareholders vote to have better transparency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)

    While an attractive pitch, remember that what's going to fuck over the working class are the laws intended to attack the assholes at the top. Which group do you think will have the means to defend themselves in court, has the power to make legislative moves, and would benefit from having another tool to fuck their slaves with?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    And those are actions are what really needs to be curtailed.

    Personally I think all lawyer fees should be paid by an entirely new (corporate) tax unless you are a small business with revenue less than a reasonable amount (absolutely not more than 100000 per employee and probably not even that much)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Class action criminal suits then.

    Prosecute everyone who owns even a single share in the company and if the working class guy goes to jail, so does the wealthy guy, no exceptions. But by share of ownership so whoever owns most, gets the most jailtime.

    Offshore shareholders can just get all their assets in the country seized.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago
    [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    Isn't this how murderers act? This sounds like they "accidentally" (collateral damage) killed people and then are trying to cover it up.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is this the one where the car crashes after Autopilot turns off? Where Tesla tries to claim that the driver floored it after it turned off?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    I really wish Roosevelt was around to smash these companies into pieces for this shit.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago
    [–] 31 points 1 year ago*

    I swear I'm not a tesla fan boy but I'm going to sit here and pull baseless excuses out of my ass for two paragraphs in order to defend this terrible company headed by a literal nazi.

    — this entire fucking comment section

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Musk = POS Nazi.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Beta test of the Tesla Autolawyer huh?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    a company doing unethical immoral things, purgery and lying to officials? thats been done a billion times already. Elon is no different then any other scum bag who runs the world.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Another reason why Leon Hitler and Krasnov shut down the NTSB office that was investigating their shitty Autopilot system.

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/actually_infuriating@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nobody will go to jail for this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 3 comments in c/BoycottUnitedStates@europe.pub view that post
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Tesla's reputation is not doing great

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Tesla is well known for its evil practices. Anyone who stands up gets reprimanded and fired.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Good reminder for anyone that still has a Tesla to a) never trust tesla autopilot and b) get a third party dashcam.

    Yes Tesla has a built-in dashcam feature and in the case above it deleted footage from the car's internal storage, not an SD card or SSD installed by the user. But would I trust it in an actual emergency when the car could feasibly delete the local copy of files? Fuuuuuck no.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    It's almost like corporations are psychopathic in nature, and Tesla's CEO is notoriously psychopathic to boot.

  • source