cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/21370783

On Monday, Mayor Patrick Collins of Cheyenne, Wyoming, announced plans for an AI data center that would consume more electricity than all homes in the state combined, according to The Associated Press. The facility, a joint venture between energy infrastructure company Tallgrass and AI data center developer Crusoe, would start at 1.8 gigawatts and scale up to 10 gigawatts of power use.

The project's energy demands are difficult to overstate for Wyoming, the least populous US state. The initial 1.8-gigawatt phase, consuming 15.8 terawatt-hours (TWh) annually, is more than five times the electricity used by every household in the state combined. That figure represents 91 percent of the 17.3 TWh currently consumed by all of Wyoming's residential, commercial, and industrial sectors combined. At its full 10-gigawatt capacity, the proposed data center would consume 87.6 TWh of electricity annually—double the 43.2 TWh the entire state currently generates.

Because drawing this much power from the public grid is untenable, the project will rely on its own dedicated gas generation and renewable energy sources, according to Collins and company officials. However, this massive local demand for electricity—even if self-generated—represents a fundamental shift for a state that currently sends nearly 60 percent of its generated power to other states.

Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon praised the project's potential benefits for the state's natural gas industry in a company statement. "This is exciting news for Wyoming and for Wyoming natural gas producers," Gordon said.

The proposed site for the new data center sits several miles south of Cheyenne near the Colorado border off US Route 85. While state and local regulators still need to approve the project, Collins expressed optimism about a quick start. "I believe their plans are to go sooner rather than later," he said.

all 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

1.8 gigawatts

Damn... think of what you could do with that much energy! That's enough to go back in time, shoot Sam Altam before he founds OpenAI, and make it back home with 600 megawatts to spare!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You need 1.21 gigawatts to go one way, so you won’t be able to come back

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This is what the rich do after 50 years of siphoning 70 Trillion from working class people.

    They will waste more electricity than all other humans combined in an attempt to automate fascism through AI.

    Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -36 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The telephone was new technology.

    Marketing teams pushing Machine Learning algorithms that have existed since the 90s is not new in any way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You have no idea what you are talking about.

    Seek therapy or some kind of religion to get what you are seeking from 30 year old Machine Learning algorithms

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    "it has saved me"

    They really can't even see that how they view and talk about AI is almost identical to how people idealize finding god and worship. They've already fully replaced one for another.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 28 points 1 year ago

    Conserve your A/C usage this summer, though.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Can we solve nuclear fusion first? Before we have rolling blackouts across the world so computers can draw fingers better

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Modern nuclear fission already solves this issue fairly adequately. We've already developed numerous ways to minimize and use nuclear waste, including reusing it in various other forms and even reactor designs. The actual amount of waste that doesn't have an alternate use is pretty small. We just haven't really attempted it. Most currently operating nuclear plants date back to designs from the 60s and 70s.

    Not to mention things like modern Advanced Geothermal systems. Some of those designs even involve reusing existing old oil drill sites, and the same workers because it's the same type of drilling. Don't even need large amounts of retraining. A major advantage of this is it's also effectively limitless since you're pulling heat out of the ground that's generated from the sheer weight of the Earth above it.

    Both of these technologies also have small ground footprints compared to their power output, especially compared to solar and wind farms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    effectively limitless

    And it's generated anyways, no matter if we pull some minuscle amount of it out or not. 47 terawatts all the time (according to wikipedia), or all the power we currently consume per year in about 150 days (assuming my quick math is even close). Of course we can't (and probably shouldn't) capture 100% of it, but there's plenty of energy to at least shut down few coal ovens.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Know why we quit building plants in the 70s? I wish this was a joke.

    The China Syndrome, a movie about a core meltdown at a nuclear power plant, came out about 2 weeks before the Three Mile Island incident.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The worst part of that is The Mike Island wasn't so much a nuclear disaster, it was a PR and communications disaster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Gods yes! A poof a radioactive steam got loose, and we quickly got a handle on it. But Americans at the time were leery of nuclear power, both through ignorance and fear of global thermonuclear war. Then that fucking movie was on our minds. What a disaster.

    I was a child and remember Oklahoma shutting down the Black Fox nuclear plant, after years of planning and construction. Hippies were already protesting, The China Syndrome gave them the political power to end it.

    Good job on that one environmentalists!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Don't discount the PR from Exelon being complete dogshit. Actively lying to the public instead of actually explaining what was going on and when getting caught by the public and called out by the media trying to double down.

    It screwed the entire industry. It proved to the public that they couldn't trust a company to tell them the truth when the issue wasn't really bad. There's no way they'd tell the truth when things were actually bad.

    It destroyed the entire industry's credibility in just a few days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    As I mentioned on the last post

    Its going to ruin most states around it too, Wyoming is a massive net electricity exporter, due to cheap coal and wind resources. A majority of what they produce is transmitted to neighboring states, as far as Oregon and Washington.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wait, why would Washington buy it? I thought the majority was hydro...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Majority, but not 100%. My point is Wyoming is a pretty supplier for electricity to most of the western grid interconnection system and taking multiple GW out of the export market so suddenly is gonna hurt the entire interconnects stability.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Unrelated this stuff can be used to shatter concrete or cinder blocks by drilling a few holes and dumping it inside followed by some water. Just in case anyone was curious.

    bucket of demolition grout

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    This must be understood as purposefully setting up the conditions to rationalize systematic violence.

    The AI is just a silly cartoon slapped on the face of a much older, simpler and more brutal strategy of gaining power, which is to magnify crisis so it can be exploited.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Reminds me that beautiful prediction

    Journalists never disappoint when they report about science

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    from what I know bitcoin mining is a huge waste of resources and it's still happening... Definitely not on that large of a scale but I honestly don't mind exaggerating the shittiness of that tech in specific

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I just drove through Wyoming and it's a prime spot for wind turbines. Too bad it's also prime for coal mining...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Why isn't humanity just pouring everything we have on achieving sustainable, clean energy? Can you imagine a world where you can prompt and mine without a care in the world, leave the lights on, charge your car for nothing? I really hope we can make fusion happen soon

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 6 comments in c/usnews@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    small hurdle to clear for the nation's least populous state, but still striking all the same.

    Because drawing this much power from the public grid is untenable, the project will rely on its own dedicated gas generation and renewable energy sources, according to Collins and company officials.

    Why do i feel like they just threw "renewable" in there to appease the most milquetoast liberals? I'm sure that that one solar panel on top of the gas power plant will make huge dent in the level of pollution caused by this data center bee eyes emoji

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wyoming resident here. There are many places in the state where wind and/or geothermal could produce enough electricity to run the site. That said, I am not sure this applies to the area they are talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I thought that was the point. They have low energy demand so it was a fitting place for datacenters

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/technology@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    As someone who loves visiting that state along with the neighbor state, this is sad. Fuck these AI data centers that will probably do more than that but also pollute the area and making an living creatures including humans unable to breath.

  • source