16
Use supervisor or desktop Linux for TV gaming PC + NAS? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

To give a bit of context : I'm upgrading my whole desktop computer so I now have a spare computer for gaming on the TV. I'm thinking of using it mainly as a gaming "console", but might be interested in embedding a NAS as well, and possibly some Docker containers for Home Assistants etc...

So the question : should I just install a normal Distro like Arch, setup a network share and Docker containers, or should I use a proper hypervisor like Unraid and have a VM for couch gaming etc...?

What issues could I expect with both? Are performances impacted with the hypervisor? (I don't plan on doing competitive games on the TV) or is troubleshooting going to be easier on a standard distro?

Did someone do such a setup and have some feedback?

Never properly used Linux before, but I'm a Windows power-user and am looking to transition part of my setup to Linux.

The GPU is going to be an RTX3070 if that matters

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Whatever you do, for the love of FL/OSS, please don't use Unraid. Proxmox and TrueNAS are far better options.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Have you considered/tried streaming games from your primary desktop PC? Obviously very dependent on your situation's specifics, but that's one of the things I do with the Linux htpc I have set up.

    And then you wouldn't have to worry about games and NAS stuff competing for system resources.

    I'd personally go the hypervisor route (I'm using proxmox, truenas, and an *arr stack on my NAS). It keeps things compartmentalized (especially network configurations) and usually keeps me from breaking everything at the same time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •