top 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 198 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The word "blame" normally implies that something bad has happened.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Exactly!

    "So, sorry we'd love to help you astroturf the EU elections, but those pesky laws are stopping us."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Exactly this. This messaging is for their customers, e.g. those that buy political ads, and their investors, those that want line go up regardless of how. They aren't speaking to their users. Their users are part of the product they sell.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 96 points 1 year ago

    This is good.

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wish we could have some of those rules here in the US...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • meta: we're stopping political ads because of the evil eu pls write them and complain

    literally everyone: another benefit to being in the eu <3

  • source
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago

    Blaming?

    You mean citing.

    This is a good thing.

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    “Blaming”? No one wants them to begin with…

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    The government parties do. That's who they're targeting with this 'news'.

    Any government party seen bending to the metatwats can fuck off too. But unfortunately they really want the exposure to show the kids how hip they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    "No one"

    They don't give a shit what their users want. Their users are part of the product they sell. Their customers are their advertisers. This is bad news for political advertisers and their investors, both of whom absolutely want political advertising on the platform. This is a good thing. It would be a much better thing if people would just stop using Meta products altogether

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is Meta threatening us in the EU with a good time?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago

    They should also fuck off

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    this is a good thing though??

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Thanks to bloc's new rules I guess. Fuck meta.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    We're sad to announce that, from that day forward, you will no longer be able to see political ads on Meta services like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

    (Idk how to blame the EU while trying to sound like a sane, professional corporation not throwing a hissy fit)

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago*

    A fantastic example of why regulation can be good and is often necessary. You can‘t leave tech corporations or even most corporations on their own accord. They need a short leash or they‘re going to tear humanity apart.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Under the regulations, which are set to take effect on Oct. 10, platforms will have to label political ads, disclosing who paid for them, and what campaign, referendum or legislative process they’re connected to

    Oh yeah they sound really unworkable, who could possibly expect meta to take this very basic information from their advertisers and then display it in a small text box.

    Of course not seeing the ads is even better so I don't think anyone will complain.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    While pushing right wing and Russian „news“ I assume.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Damn stupid me! Once again thought this was #goodnews

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    I guess this is a win-win situation 🤩

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    They probably think this will persuade the politicians to review these rules, as they can't reach their target audiences anymore. I hope they see the overwhelming support for this decision, but I'm not sure if I'm in a bubble. I only see positive reactions so far. There was 1 critical article in the news, but just stating facts, no opinions. I think it's great. Less brainwashing going on during the election cycles from now on since Facebook in particular allowed for some really specific demographic targeting.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    nothing is stopping them to push propaganda(russian backed) into peoples feeds that arnt ads.

  • source
  • Good, now Hungary can put that 2M EUR per month from propaganda into research, education and healthcare.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    The regulations impose additional requirements for a reason - because political advertising can be extremely dangerous. If it's a question of no political advertising or opaque, microtargeted political advertising that can't be investigated later, then it's an easy choice.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    "I'm sorry to say I cannot accept any more money from disinformation groups political parties, particularly from certain regions* because another region won't let me put your ads out there for the plebs users to be manipulated informed."

    ^*^ ^-^ ^Russia,^ ^China,^ ^North^ ^Korea,^ ^Iran,^ ^and^ ^other^ ^associated^ ^places.^

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Oh shit, really?

    That's really a pity that luckily for me I'm no longer giving an absolute metric fuck about meta and any of its shit content or its servi..spywares since 10 years at least already, and also I haven't the slightest idea of changing my plans in that regard.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    There is nothing to blame about except this should have come earlier and everywhere.

  • source