all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 37 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    '...(potentially setting time back to 1900)...'

    From my understanding, unless I'm mistaken, wouldn't the 32 bit time reset back to 1970 after the overflow/rollover?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    you're wrong, but so was the article, so I guess that cancels out :D it's late 1901

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    But that's not a solution, it's just postponing the problem!!1!one

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "it's just postponing the problem!!1!one" The thing of including a "one" to make the irony of your exclamation abundantly clear is a delightful bit of internet-ese. I always find it funny when I see it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    True, but only if the latest theories on Big Crunch being back on the table don't hold up. Debian ought to not only push out 64 bit time, but place "now" right in the middle to cover any discoveries of an older universe. Hell, they ought to do that and make it 128 bit, to cover anything.

    Exponentials can be profound when you grasp them for that fleeting second.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    The actual transition happened ages ago - 2024 or so. A bunch of transitional packages in Testing and Sid had -t64 appended for a while.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Hmm, Debian and other long-term support distros are kind of in a tricky position with problems like these. On the one hand, they don't want to break things, so they'll often make changes like these relatively late. But on the other hand, someone might still run a current version of the distro in 2038, so they actually want to solve it as early as possible, too.

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 80 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Typical, kicking the can down the road instead of actually fixing the problem. And what happens 292 billion years from now when we all go through this again, huh?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Some Debian installs are used for 10+ years, so makes a lot of sense to do it now.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Finally learning some lessons!

    The century date problem as it was known before Y2K was first described in the 1950s but people assumed it would be a moot point long before it was a problem.

    When some of those mainframes were still in use in the 70s it was brought up again but nothing was done because it was assumed that it would be a moot point long before it was a problem.

    When some of those mainframes or software were still in use (banks, oil companies, the IRS, etc) in the 90s it was finally seen a as a problem and cost billions of dollars to fix.

    Then it happened again in 2020 because it turns out that the fix was to kick the can down the road again.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And what will we do when we get to December 4th, 292,277,026,596 AD, at 20:10:55 UTC?????

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    And dorks like to say smart watches don’t need 64 bit.

  • source