all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

This title could not possibly be any more misleading.

[...] developer 1047 Games has said it’s taking the game off sale in order to work on it further, listen to fan complaints, and attempt to move forward.

Just putting "unlaunching" in the title mosleads people into thinking it is going offline forever like Concord. I can imagine that is probably the article authors intention with a title like that, but that is simply not true.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Hey, publishers? Stop demanding multiplayer-only shooters. They're either the biggest thing in months or stone dead. It's a stupid gamble you will reliably lose.

    And the one cocksure nose-candy addict who does back the biggest thing in months still won't make Fortnite kinds of money.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Splitgate was always a multiplayer only shooter though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    CEO came on stage wearing a "Make FPS great again" hat.

    Double downs on it.

    Now this.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I actually really liked splitgate 1 and was stoked for splitgate 2 but the anticheat wasn't Linux compatible so I never played it.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/gaming@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This comes just after the whole "Make fps great again" issue happened. Not a good time to be on that team

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    The ceo is the son of one of the founders of Inuit, the turbotax/quickbooks company. Hes even on sliptgates board.

    The owner is pure nepo and will never face any consequence for failure. Its pretty easy to see why they dont care about killing the company and fucking the employees.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wow, I've seen plenty of games launch unfinished but 'unlaunching' is a new one for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    They failed with the first game after it spiked in popularity. They were only ever releasing a number 2 in an attempt to cash in on another spike, but it didnt work out did it.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Relaunching never seems to work out. Just look at Multiversus and Bloodhunt.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Counterpoint: Final Fantasy XIV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    I kind of feel like the golden age of "rebooted live service game" is behind us, tbh. We had games like FFXIV and Rainbow Six: Siege that launched rough, but committed to fixing it and then successfully turned it around. In those days, there weren't many live service games, so people were willing to wait out a possible turnaround. In the time since, we have been absolutely drowning in live-service games, and many of them are free-to-play. Why would I wait for the Splitgate turnaround when there are 3 other live-service f2p shooters that I haven't even tried yet? If I'm a kid or young adult that came up on Roblox, I might even be content with the shooters built into that platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    This is actually a very sincere statement from the company. Kind of refreshing.

  • source