post
The shit apple doesn't fall far from the shit tree Randy
"partying with" may be a bit of a stretch. "Attending an event for wealthy American oligarchs with"? Yeah, I buy that.
"New York Academy of Art gala"
Any event containing the word "gala" is not for the plebes.
I was browsing Epstein's black book yesterday, and it is actually a little alarming how many Kennedys are in there. I know an address book isn't the same as a client list, but it does mean that they most likely knew one another.
I also learned that Minnie Driver as of 2008 or so, when this black book was seized as part of an investigation, used an EarthLink.net email address lol
You know who you won't see? Rick Moranis, Mr. Rodgers, Steve Irwin, and mother fucking Samuel L. Jackson. If I remember right, turns out Bob was a shit bag.
Isn't that David Spade right behind him?
Hey Qanon!
Here’s your deep state.
e: sorry, downvoters; you’ve been had, but it’s not too late. There are real conspiracies here.
The q anon prophet tweeted out fuck Trump the other day
They're totally latching onto this. It's wonderful. Trump was so cartoonishly obvious in trying to cover it up, it made them bite down harder and start foaming at the mouth
Qanon needs to look in plain sight! A former GOP Speaker of the House (3rd in line to the presidecy) went to prison after it was found out he molested AT LEAST four teenage boys. This actually happened. It's not some conspiracy theory. It happened in plain sight and I'll bet none now about it
Has anyone seriously followed the money trails between Epstein and his affluent clients? Surely they paid him large sums for his depraved services?
I'm sure some of them did, but I'm sure others paid in favors of the politically corrupt variety
Don't see any report as yet but yes, the money trail will raise some interesting questions.
His huge New York home was “gifted” to him…
I’m sure diligent internet sleuths could track some of the money trails.
The treasury department has a ton of documents on some 1.5B dollars of Epstein’s. It can be traced. Nobody seems willing.
We got his book with the names of his clients, it's publicly available https://epsteinsblackbook.com/
It's a bunch of important and wealthy people so nothing will be done.
I wish I saved the link. I saw a story yesterday that the money was routed through Russia, which is why Trump has been their bitch this whole time.
Shit apples
This is disrespectful to shit, let alone apples.
Even shit has purpose. These people. Literally have none.
not exactly new information, he already admitted to having flown with Epstein. his explanation was that he lived in new york most of his life and knew a lot of people. he even listed some bangers:
I knew Harvey Weinstein. I knew Roger Ailes. OJ Simpson came to my house. Bill Cosby came to my house.
and he said you can't know these people until this stuff comes out. which is of course everyone's excuse. mango mussolini as his best friend never knew about it. Alan Dersh as his long time friend and lawyer never knew about it. RFK Jr never knew about it even though he knew a lot of people in new york and was wealthy... none of those people he knew said anything to him apparently.
i wonder how Epstein was able to do so much trafficking for so long without literally anyone around him having any clue about it.
of COURSE THIEL is there.
He just really likes partying with rapists and sexual predators. He likes to brag about it. They're his kind of people.
So who else has on their tinfoil hat checklist the whole Russia-driven blackmail strategy using Jeffrey Epstein stuff to put controllable Anti American and anti democracy UIs and assets in all key seats of the US? 😂
Is it just the dark circles under his eyes or does he look a bit like Edward Norton in Fight Club?
I am tired of paywalls, this is not something someone should have to pay to know.
Here's a link without paywall: https://web.archive.org/web/20250724192449/https://www.thedailybeast.com/rfk-jr-pictured-partying-with-child-sex-predator-jeffrey-epstein/
Being pictured, associating, knowing, having partied or being in the general vicinity of Epstein doesn’t really mean anything. Wherever there was a concentration of net worths the guy was there.
Flying on a private jet with Epstein bc your wife was friends with Maxwell is not being in the general vicinity of. And "partying with Epstein" is not like they both accidentally wound up at the same party.
This dude's entire career was sex trafficking. If he was "partying" he was working.
Like I told the other guy I’m not defending RFK specifically, but Epstein knew pretty much everyone in the 1%. It’s a small club. You need a lot more proof than a photo or riding his jet. Like I don’t know if you know this but people with jets let other people use it all the time, including strangers. It’s pretty normal for them.
I’m just not one for throwing accusations without strong evidence only because I don’t like the person. But that’s just me.
And all those other women RFK has been accused of sexually assaulting really speak to his character, plus all the other unstable shit he's done. A+ standup guy. At least he apologized, so I guess that's a good sign. RFK Jr texts apology to sexual assault accuser - reports
Kennedy has also come under scrutiny over trips he took on Epstein’s private plane, his late wife’s links with convicted associate Ghislaine Maxwell, and his past association with former industry titans such as Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby.
Oh good, the whole gang is here.
But Kennedy, the nephew of former president John F. Kennedy, came under fire for the plane rides again last year when he bizarrely defended his association with Epstein by listing other sex predators he knew.
"I mean, I knew Harvey Weinstein. I knew Roger Ailes. I knew... O.J. Simpson came to my house. Bill Cosby came to my house,” Kennedy told comedian Andrew Schulz during a podcast. The comments were widely pilloried, given Weinstein was a notorious Hollywood mogul convicted of rape; Ailes was ousted as the head of Fox News amid sexual harassment allegations; Simpson was acquitted in a double murder case involving his former wife and her friend; and Cosby was jailed for sexual assault before a court overturned his conviction.
So clearly this proves his relationship with Epstein was a nothing burger, bc most of his friends are creepy rich men that have done horrific things and gotten away with it waaay too many times.
But other than all that, I guess it's kind of unfair for people to jump to any conclusions.
Ok you’re just kinda unhinged or something because I’m not really defending RFK, I’m just saying that you need actual evidence to accuse him or anyone of anything just for knowing or even having a friendship with Epstein. I’ve hung out with people who have been accused of crimes, does that mean I must necessarily be a conspirator with them?
So let's ignore his own sexual assault on his baby sitter. You've hung out with sex traffickers and rapists? Bc there's a big difference between people who commit crimes and people who commit crimes of sexual assault. Especially when the same person commits multiple sexual assaults. Even stranger if you're friends with multiple people who have committed multiple sexual assaults.
And yeah, this shit has me pretty riled up and "unhinged." I find it a little odd that someone would be white knighting RFK in this situation.
For all I know yes, multiple times maybe. I don’t ask for people’s criminal history when I meet them and not everyone I hang out with is an intimate friend even if I hang out with them in multiple occasions. But just as likely no.
I’m not defending him specifically, I repeat for the third time.
But this guy knew he'd hung out with a bunch of rapists. And the only reason we know that is because he tried to downplay the fact that he'd hung out with one rapist, by bringing up all the other rapists he'd also hung out with. As if to normalize associating with rapists. So I'm not sure why you feel the need to defend the general situation, when you have all this additional information about this specific situation?
Like I told the other guy I’m not defending RFK specifically, but Epstein knew pretty much everyone in the 1%. It’s a small club.
I don't know if you know this but it turns out many of the actual elites are pretty much scumbags that are complicit in each other's crimes. Harvey Weinstein, for instance, was known to be a sexual predator in the 1990s. Many, many people in Epstein's inner circle knew exactly who he was and were around him despite that or because of it.
One time? Sure.
But there are so many photos and videos of these same people at parties, many with underaged girls, and certain people are at nearly all of them.
Why would anyone defend them after all we’ve seen? They certainly wouldn’t defend you.
*autocorrect
It’s like Diddy, is every other rapper a sexual predator like him then? Or what about that Weinstein? Is 90% of Hollywood also conspiring with him to abuse women? You gotta understand these are small circles, no shit they are photographed together and in parties together, it’s like if you belonged to a club and someone in your club was a criminal. Does that mean you must also necessarily be a criminal? Even if you have committed crimes yourself, separate from the crimes of that person. It’s easy to imagine that yes you might be, but it doesn’t mean it necessarily is true.
Whether someone would defend me or not does not factor in the equation. If I would defend the same principle im stating if this was Obama who had a picture with Epstein in the same party it would be extremely hypocritical of me to take the opposite stance simply because it’s some one I do not like. I’m never gonna lend myself to hypocrisy.
It’s like Diddy, is every other rapper a sexual predator like him then?
You must be a troll, because a serious person wouldn’t say this.
You know that real people are behind these names, right?
Do you realise that real people are reading your comments or are you just having fun here? I’ll answer if you’re serious, but I don’t believe you are.
I’m serious. You’re saying that people, by merely being in the same circles as a criminal may be complicit in the crimes of that person. I’m telling you that is not a rational stance to take. I used Diddy as an example since he is a fixture of the hip hop world and pretty much has a photo in a party with every A and B lister in the game. Does that mean that all of them partook in his activities?
That just makes it worse.
Yeah, it means nothing. It makes total sense his ex-wife, who hanged herself after he divorced her, took the kids and she found his journal describing 37 of his many affairs, would be the one that was good buddies with Ghislane Maxwell. Not the guy who sexually assaulted his babysitter.
Going out of your way to defend trump, diddy, and epstein is not a good look, btw.
Not defending anyone, I’m defending the concept of being able to associate with anyone without being accused of being complicit with their crimes should they commit any. Is that so hard to grasp? Think critically about this for 5 seconds.
Think of any figure you like, imagine they had a photo in a party with any of these people. Does that mean that person was complicit in the crimes if any of them? Of course not. Not even if they had committed similar crimes to theirs.
Fuck that liberal thinking.
No, if you're pictured with Epstein, you need to prove your innocence. You should get a chance to defend yourself, but that's probable cause as far as I'm concerned

top 27 comments