Data: about 6,900 opinions from YouTube reviews and 3,600 from Reddit owners, on 654 products, collected for BettaScore (a ranking site)

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I’d assume the difference is probably down to owners using the products for an extended period of time compared to reviewers.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Was thinking the same. Most reviewers get sent a bunch of things to test so spend a short amount of time. Plus there is no incentive to judge longevity as long as people buy it, and they get commission

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago

    Well yeah, users actually have a product for hopefully years while reviewers just check it out for a week or 2.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago (1 child)

    It’s interesting to think that reddit is by its very nature a more negative platform. I’d say that holds outside of just product reviews tho. I feel so bad for people trying to learn a challenging hobby on reddit. I often tell new people to bolt for the fediverse before wasting time with your new hobby’s smartest misanthropes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 hour ago

    People who are happy with their stuff mostly stay quiet, so complaints get overrepresented. That makes Reddit useful for finding problems, but it can make a fine product look worse than it is. Lemmy has been a lot friendlier.

  • source
  • parent