[...]

Chinese authorities have begun constructing what will be the world's largest hydropower dam in Tibetan territory, in a project that has sparked concerns from India and Bangladesh.

Chinese Premier Li Qiang presided over a ceremony marking the start of construction on the Yarlung Tsangpo river on Saturday, according to local media.

The river flows through the Tibetan plateau. The project has attracted criticism for its potential impact on millions of Indians and Bangladeshis living downriver, as well as the surrounding environment and local Tibetans.

[...]

Experts and officials have flagged concerns that the new dam would empower China to control or divert the trans-border Yarlung Tsangpo, which flows south into India's Arunachal Pradesh and Assam states as well as Bangladesh, where it feeds into the Siang, Brahmaputra and Jamuna rivers.

A 2020 report published by the Lowy Institute, an Australian-based think tank, noted that "control over these rivers [in the Tibetan Plateau] effectively gives China a chokehold on India's economy".

In an interview with news agency PTI earlier this month, Arunachal Pradesh chief minister Pema Khandu expressed concern that the Siang and Brahmaputra could "dry up considerably" once the dam was completed.

He added that the dam was "going to cause an existential threat to our tribes and our livelihoods. It is quite serious because China could even use this as a sort of 'water bomb'".

"Suppose the dam is built and they suddenly release water, our entire Siang belt would be destroyed," he said. "In particular, the Adi tribe and similar groups... would see all their property, land, and especially human life, suffer devastating effects."

[...]

China has been eyeing the steep valleys and mighty rivers in the rural west - where Tibetan territories are located - to build mega-dams and hydropower stations that can sustain the country's electricity-hungry eastern metropolises. President Xi Jinping has personally pushed for this in a policy called "xidiandongsong", or "sending western electricity eastwards".

[...]

Activists say the dams are the latest example of Beijing's exploitation of Tibetans and their land - and past protests have been crushed.

Last year, the Chinese government rounded up hundreds of Tibetans who had been protesting against another hydropower dam. It ended in arrests and beatings, with some people seriously injured, the BBC learned through sources and verified footage.

There are also environmental concerns over the flooding of Tibetan valleys renowned for their biodiversity, and the possible dangers of building dams in a region rife with earthquake fault lines.

[...]

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
22 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure they don't say damn or fucken damn in China.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Isnt this basically what India is doing to Pakistan? Correct me if im wrong plz.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Doesn't really make sense for either of them though. IWT was regularly abused in the opposite way where India would allow flood water to go full downstream since the treaty only really makes provisions for droughts.

    If they build a dam, all that water would rapidly collect on each country's side which even with a planned lake location, probably won't be enough to absorb it all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago
    [–] 0 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    China is so good for the climate hur hur hur solar panels hur hur

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    what the fuck does a gigantic dam have to do with solar?

    damming up giant river systems is old school proven tech that will displace petroleum and coal burning. is it ideal? Not really. So they're diversifying. Mountains of solar are better than burning coal.

    apologies for linking to reddit but it's the video source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Their last big one slowed the earth's rotation. How much can we do that before there is seriously negative side effects?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    0.06 microseconds PER DAY.

    we got tons of room for more dams if that's the reasoning you're going with, but really cute strawman lol. again, not endorsing dams - just pointing out they have FUCKALL to do with solar power (which is what he's pissing on about) and they do displace coal burning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • My comment made it clear it hasn't had a negative impact recognized and was asking how much can it be slowed before it does. Implying my belief is continuing to do this on a large enough scale should be a concern. Go ahead and put your own meaning to my words tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I’m mocking them for distracting people with solar while they keep destroy the planet anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    distracting people with solar

    did you not see the literal mountain of solar they're installing and selling around the world?

    Distracting?

    Awkward position I don't want to defend them on anything but distraction? If so it's remarkably effective at generating gigawatts and offsetting production of coal fired plants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Yes I see them destroying a mountain, and I agree that is better than fossil fuels.

    So let’s talk about how this dam is going to destroy entire ecosystems for hundreds or thousands of miles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yes I see them destroying a mountain

    No no no, you don't. That's your hyperbole crying again. That mountain hasn't been destroyed. Now come on, use your eyes, the mountains and hills are plainly still there. If you can't help yourself but whine, pity the plants that used to live on those hillsides, but even they will probably be fine, read up on agrovoltaics, solar arrays make great habitats once the plants and animals figure it out.

    See, you just can't stop with your hate. It's consuming everything about you, obviously your ability to posit a comprehendible premise without it turning into a whining, mewling, pissy little rant about them evil chinamen.

    You got issues bud.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    solar arrays make great habitats once the plants and animals figure it out.

    Once they learn to adapt to humanity. Nice. 🤡

    I hate all humans equally, sweetie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Hydropower is literally good for the climate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    This is not entirely true, dams are feeding grounds for methane-producing microbes which cause climate harm. Aside from that, even small scale dams damage local ecosystems significantly - at the scale China is planning, their dam will be incredibly damaging.

    https://www.science.org/content/article/hundreds-new-dams-could-mean-trouble-our-climate

    https://earth.org/dams-economic-assets-or-ecological-liabilities/

    https://www.dw.com/en/five-ways-mega-dams-harm-the-environment/a-53916579

  • source
  • parent