all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 78 points 1 day ago

A movie made for everybody is a movie made for nobody.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 1 day ago

    That inspires no confidence

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    No? That's how you get a bland, watered-down movie with no soul that everyone is fine with, but that no one loves...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago

    Because "designed by committee", whilst meaning the same thing, has negative connotations.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago

    I disagree, though I see his point.

    The obvious thing is to point to the Evil Dead "trilogy". They worked because they weren't made for everyone. Rocky Horror remains a culture icon for the same reason.

    But, you know, superman. We have the example if the Christopher Reeve films of what can be done with the goal of staying friendly to kids and adults across wide age ranges you can absolutely make good movies that appeal to the widest possible audience.

    But I disagree that's what needs to be done with DC's characters. Oh, there's some that do need it, and I actually think the newest Superman movie successfully did it. But you can't pull off that same vibe with Wonder Woman, and it would destroy a Batman movie that isn't a reboot of the Adam West version.

    The thing about DC' characters is that there's layers. More so than Marvel, DC has a history of keeping their darker stuff apart from their lighter fare. You can't throw Red Hood into the super friends, you dig? Not literally, because that cartoon was a different universe, so Red Hood there was be much less gritty and grim™.

    But you could throw him into either of the suicide squad movies. You could maybe make him work in Lanterns.

    I think he likely means that he wants to just dump any of the less granny/kid friendly characters from the DCCU. Which is also a bad idea since the current generation of grannies is early genX and late boomers that are superhero accepting. To achieve what he's wanting would mean trying to convince a broader audience to sign up. Not impossible, but you'd water things down so much that established fans of the characters will nope out. Hell, the serious comic geeks already do nope out of a lot of the live action DC stuff.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago

    Is this guy's 110 year old grandma going to the movies very often? He must think he's sitting on some untapped market of centenarians who've been refraining from giving Hollywood their millions.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Sounds like it would be the blandest and shallowest plot full of spetacle, kinda like Marvel movies.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    I really hate the amount of resources that boomer slop media is getting from the entertainment industry. It’s a relatively small percentage, but definitely larger than I recall ever seeing in the past.

    I understand the logic, but fuck, older people used to just watch media from their youth. I can’t imagine the Hollywood of previous generations ever giving much of a shit about whether or not senior citizens would want to watch their films or TV shows.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago

    I don't know what it is like in other countries, but in mine, the elderly all love to watch detective shows like Barnaby and they adore Mrs Hyacinth.

    I like Hyacinth well enough, but all these detective shows are like watching paint dry and they are all the same. My dad would talk about this detective show and that detective show and they would all have different names, but I could never tell them apart.

    Maybe the older generation really would love super hero movies, because to me, it's the same shit there. They all have different names and costumes, but it's just the same movie over and over again.

    They can have super man and batman show up at a crime scene and question people for two hours while intermittedly going "hmm... curious. Very curious" and then have one half assed chase scene if they feel frisky and then a 20 minute monologue where Batman reveals the plot and whom the perp is and why they did what they did. Old people in my country would love that shit. The rest of us would feel lobotimized.

  • source
  • parent
  • Well, guess I'm not seeing another DC movie in theaters.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    DC already sucked because of how many times they've rebooted everything. But, this...?...yeah, I'm out.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    DC: Dumb Curmudgeons

  • source
  • 16 comments in c/dcstudios@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 26 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    DC fan boys are about to find jesus.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 21 hours ago*

    Ha oh. Oh no.

    They really buried the lede here. You don't give interviews for that particular outlet unless you're a specific type of crazy.

    The "outside the bubble of Hollywood" thing is also a Christian dog whistle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 day ago

    This will end well.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 day ago

    So; boring and without meaningful commentary on anything of substance. Glad to know not to waste my time.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    So ... we're never gonna find out what happened to Peacemaker, then.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Like they were ever good to begin with….

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment