I'm the US you could potentially be prosecuted for incitement, but the actuall scope under which this prosecution would be successful is pretty narrow because the first amendment gives you the right to free speech.
Basically, for an incitement prosecution to succeed it needs to be that case that your speech would likely (or did) incite imminent lawless action.
So if you were in a lynch mob that had kidnapped someone, and you pointed at a tree and shouted to the mob that they should hang the kidnapping victim, you could probably be successfully prosecuted because your speech could reasonably lead to imminent lawless action.
On the other hand, if you and some other internet weirdos are hanging out the comments section of an internet weirdo magazine and, in the course of a discussion about a corrupt prosecutor the magazine ran an article on, you say that "She should be fed feet-first through a wood chipper", you would probably not be successfully prosecuted for incitement. That is because your rhetoric is unlikely to inspire imminent lawless action. Most people would recognize it as political hyperbole and thus protected under the first amendment.
That fact, however, might not be enough to keep a prosecutor from investigating you. They might run you through the legal process even though they know they will fail in court since exposing someone to legal jeopardy is extremely stressful and can be ruinously expensive.
all 8 comments