all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 22 hours ago* (1 child)

its not just the software. Every pcb and silicon wafer, every switch and router must be sourced, designed and fabricated in Canada. Secure Level 0 then you can secure Level 1.

think of what mossad just accomplished against Lebanon with pagers. Just imagine what clandestine hardware attack vector capacity must exist behind redactions and air gaped files.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago

    LPC loves murder tech.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago

    The risks? Supporting morons with a kippa trying to bring back Christy boy whilst waging a genocide

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 9 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

    The risks:

    From left to right: Peter Thiel, Canada

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

    "Do you believe in israel's right to defend itself?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago (2 children)

    Is that a question or a quote?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 14 hours ago
    [–] 2 points 7 hours ago

    I guess we could hop onto "X" and ask the government directly.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago

    Risk; Peter Thiel guetting hard because he's been wanting to show us his antichrist outfit.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

    Bednar said Canada should nevertheless invest in developing that technology domestically.

    I dissagree. The investment costs are too high want so many NATO partners are already working solutions and DELTA will beavailible for sale after the Russian war of aggression ends.

    Better to stopgap with Palantir and put innovation funding towards actual innovations than copying old tech (and things Canadian companies can export).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment