In the grand scheme of things, not that much. It's just a building really, just with extra security. I'm not opposed to a conference room but it had to be done as the people's house through Congress. But I think the whole notion is poisoned for a good while.

I’m betting you could get more than enough qualified volunteers to do it super fast

Depends.

If the next president is a Republican they can dump as much money into whatever the fuck they want and conservatives will fall in line and support it. No matter how wasteful it is. No matter how long it takes.

If the next president is Democrat, they will be held to higher standards, and spending a bunch of tax payer dollars to tear down something that was just built would probably be viewed as unnecessarily wasteful so they probably won't do it. They might repurpose it for actual office work intead of using it as a ballroom for people with small dicks though.

republicans and ml "Democrats more concerned with destroying the ballroom and replacing the rose garden than with (some made up culture war bullshit) / (gEnOsiDe!11!) !!"

I suggest leaving it. Call it "Tramponium Room of Beautiful deals" and use as a museum of covfefe-tier things.

Don't tear it down. Make it into a a homeless outreach center and a women's shelter.

I mean tearing it down just sounds a waste of taxpayer money. Although admittedly considering the shoddy job they're almost certainly doing we might have to tear it down for safety purposes.

What about the Oracle data center being constructed under the ballroom? Maybe fill it with cement?

Who gives a fuck

Do we need to factor in grifting fees like the cost of the ballroom?