all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We’ll stop wearing them after a year

Who the hell buys clothes like that? It can’t be sustainable for your wallet let alone the planet.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Where I currently live it's literally impossible to get clothes that last over a year or two. I've had shirts fall apart at the seams, shorts that developed holes in most unfortunate places, and garments that shrunk due to washing so much I can't wear them anymore, all within the first year of use. I try to patch things up before throwing them away, but the synthetic textiles just get thin and disintegrate at some point, probably also filling up everything with microplastics along the way. It's cheaper to produce flimsy synthetic shit, and also forces you to buy new clothes every year (even if you don't follow "the trends"), thus more profit for the manufacturer.

    I tend to buy second-hand stuff, because if it's being resold after use it's probably not as flimsy, and also it's better for the environment. Even then most things I buy turn out to be shit.

    I have a couple of good quality clothing items that I regularly wear, but I had to ship them in from another country, pay import fees, etc. Way too much fuss when you need a new T-shirt now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I think you've got a lot of people who have never been exposed to the idea of long term use of clothes. If you have the idea that the most important thing is looking good, then it makes sense to get something that you intend to throw away.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    My take is this. Say what you want about Henry Ford, he was a man who truly loved to drive and wanted to make great cars. Same with old Hollywood studio bosses; horrible people who really wanted to make great movies. Now all the bosses are MBAs who care only about the bottom line. Their names aren't connected to the product and they couldn't care less about whether what they make is of any use whatsoever.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The executives certainly deserve a lot of the blame. But most large corporations are owned by hedge funds, private equity and other layers of obfuscation that are designed to shield the powerful from accountability. After a few layers of abstraction nothing matters but line go up and if line not go up, the C-suite gets replaced before you can say "golden parachute". These guys only care for the next quarterly results and are trying to ride the gravy train for as long as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    When AR goggles become ubiquitous, we'll wear simple, gray modesty garments, and they'll rent us digital clothes. The world will look however we want, lush, and expensive, but in reality, we'll live in plain boxes. "Rich" people will have bigger boxes. Reality will be reserved for the filthy rich, you'll recognize them immediately, because they won't be wearing goggles.

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Bewildering? Quality is dropping so profit margins can increase.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    There's nothing bewildering about this.

    It's a logical step in the chain after having fully imbibed neoclassical economics and its bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Bewildering. No one who runs anything knows anything. Anyone who knows anything is doing not leading.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    the author seems to defend the AI-ification of customer service, lol

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    This is exactly how post-capitalism was predicted to go. As consolidation eliminates competition, there's no reason to maintain quality. If it's crap or nothing, people have to buy the crap.

  • source