It's just about the wording, doesn't change the plan of very close ties.
post
the eu doesn't have anything called "associate membership" so if this passed they would have had to actually define what that means. makes sense to change the wording to something less formal but equally signifying.
The main negative of the EU has always been their ability to disagree about the most mundane and inconsequential things making every decision like wading through treacle.
I'm so sick of merz and his stupid face.
From what I've read and seen I think Carney just wants closer ties as well, not some sort of official status. EU shouldn't worry however, Canada will most likely share access to the arctic, which I believe is what this is really about.
Cowards.
Same deal, different name. "Associate membership" does open a can of worms.
Really, it's not that big a deal, it was kind of a silly semantics game to call it "Associate Membership" anyway. It was more about headlines provoking the Coppertone Fascist. That a trade deal is cut is the important part.
Closer ties - it's still something ig? just not so much not too fast as many would wish. But no big drama ig?
It was bold move from the start, such needs taken lots of care. Still good they going nice direction of growing, even if slower.
“Genocide buddies” would be more honest. Free Palestine and Land Back.
Not everything has to do with America Palestine
If you think the U(K)SA & Germany are the only complicit countries, I have a bridge for sale, etc.
Dude, this has nothing to do with middle east. What did even France or Italy do for you to call them genocide-buddies and how would Canada be mixed up in this? Why are you insulting so many countries and people?
Close reddit lemmy and touch grass
France and Canada both supply weapons to Israel. While Italy backed off new arms shipments they are still providing supplies AKA material support for genocide.
So inconvenient to bring up genocide, I know.
But why are you bringing up Palestine war instead of Ukraine war, which is far deadlier and actually affects countries in this article? That one affects Europe much more directly, including the talks about Ukraine also becoming an associate member, just like Canada?
In other words - why the hell are you talking about Palestine under this article and then even claiming "so inconvenient to bring up genocide" while not even inconvenient, just really, really random
I didn't bring this up, OP of this thread did. You commented and I commented. It is called a conversation. No one is forcing you to get "off topic" if that is really what you believe.
You’ve been corrected on this already. Both entities are responsible in part for what is opening in Palestine. How can you possibly not be aware of that?
Both entities are responsible in part for what is opening in Palestine
The question is about how is that relevant to multiple countries veto'ing the associate aggreement
It is not the question. It’s your question.
Countries vetoing this agreement are complicit in genocide currently and historically. Countries like that collaborating is not a good thing.
Ask anyone appealing to these governments to stop facilitating genocide. They use their interrelationships to point to each other and shirk responsibility. It’s a very big problem.
Naah, I think it's because those countries historically were involved in slave trade. I think slave trade is the real reason diplomacy in Europe is't going smooth. And no, you cannot ask me why as that is not the question, you cannot deny that slaves didn't exist so it all fits
This is how you sound like. I'm not even continuing this.
There is a genocide happening today. You seem to be happy to talk about anything but that.
There are more slaves in modern times than historically.
I thought you were finished.
I just read your profile. You’re a genocide apologist. That explains how dedicated you are to being obtuse!
This does though
all 39 comments