LOL, what a fitting outcome. The racist and Nat-C wing of the conservatives getting blown up by the cartoon economics wing of the conservatives...
post
man, i hate the fact that libertarian-ism got coopted by the right.
Likewise. Got so sick of those assholes over at r/libertarianism parroting “ThErE’s No SuCh ThInG aS a LeFt LiBeRtArIaN” that I just up and left Reddit, the Libertarian party, and at least 30% of my remaining faith in humanity behind.
Thats not what OG libertarian-ism was about. The right has dragged that word trough the mud.
Left libertarians are the complete opposite of so called right-'libertarians'. Unlike them, left-libertarians run bottom up organized social services. Such services cannot be easily gutted because they are directly funded by the public.
You're not wrong, the Tea Party and Minutemen destroyed the Libertarian party in 2000s.
I think it was backlash from Ross Perot, who ran a solid third-party campaign and put the fear of God into them.
Oh, now we love third parties huh? The GOP is an existential threat so tbh whatever takes them out is a good thing, but long term stuff like this makes democracy look stupid and that's not good for a healthy and stable democracy, so we really need to make ranked choice a thing everywhere.
This is less about "democracy". But more about the state building systems to undermine democracy and concentrate power.
It's a sad state for sure that at the national level, the only thing third parties are good for is losing. But it's just a fact of the systems that have been built. Ranked choice is a good thing regardless. But we really need to do away with or heavily reign in any office at the level of an entire state or higher. State governor, or federal Senate. Even the federal house honestly. And they're should be no presidents to flirt with this unitary executive fascist bullshit. If we are to elect for offices, we need them to stay connected and answerable.
But it won't stop people from repeating "Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line" over and over.
An unpopular war with Iran and Trump’s expansion of executive power — two issues that grate on an anti-establishment slice of the American right — could fuel the Libertarian Party’s message of nonintervention and limited centralized authority. . .
“Some libertarians supported him thinking he was an anti-war candidate. And that’s where he’s lost them,” Brown said. “But my view and a lot of libertarians’ view is that separation of powers is very important. This president has seized way too much power in this imperial presidency.”
I've been saying for years that if Democrats actually want to appeal to "moderate Republicans" they should forget about the neocon wing and focus on the libertarian wing. They should be criticizing the Iran War more strongly (instead of just criticizing how it's been conducted) and should call for things like repealing the Patriot Act (especially with Trump holding the executive and benefitting from expanded powers). But somehow it's always the authoritarian weirdos like Zionists and transphobes who they try to appease instead.
Personally, I think they should focus on mobilizing the base instead of trying to appeal to the right. But if you are gonna appeal to the right, you should be appealing to people who have some disagreements with the GOP and sometimes break with it instead of the people who are getting exactly what they want from it.
Ohh no!!! Any ways... Republican policies suck unless you're Filthy Rich, Closeted-Self hating persons of the LGBTQ+ community, or a moron. Check your bank account for the 1st. The last 2 are self identifying
Well, they're not entirely worthless after all.
The right's greatest trick has always been to disguise the fact that they are conservatives.
Conservatives loooove capitalism, why do you think that is? What do they even teach you in school down there?
They spent too much time drilling anti-communist propaganda into your brains and not enough time educating "y'all" on what communism and the left actually is.
all 26 comments