I don't even get why democrats are releasing anti-trans ads (I mean, I do, and it's because all the political advisors say it's a divisive issue despite having no evidence of that). Like, even if they don't care about trans rights at all, they can just make ads that don't mention it. It can only hurt them for taking a diet republican side on an issue because it can alienate their more left voters. If AIPAC can be smart enough to promote a progressive and split the progressive vote in a primary, why can't democrats be smart enough to realize that anti-trans ads can only hurt them?
post
Well, the GOP has no monopoly on idiots, it seems.
Remember to vote BLUE no matter WHO! It's IMPORTANT to vote Democrat so we can CHANGE things!
-People voting for El-Sayed's REPUBLICAN Opponent AFTER they voted for Independent Andrew Cuomo in New York!
No joke, I saw a "Democrats for Mike Rogers" sign on someone's lawn yesterday.
The sign might as well have said "I pretend to care a little more than Republicans but I'm still a racist piece of shit"
Democrats for Mike Rodgers pac is funded by republicans it is very likely the people displaying the sign are republicans as well.
most politicians say stuff on video nowadays and not really writing articles anymore since the invention of the radio pretty much
...what?
It used to be that politicians wrote articles for newspapers in order to communicate with the wider public. This practice has been obsoleted by radio somewhat but definitely by video and TV. Which is why I think it's odd for a "politics" comm to ban video, and focus on "only articles", since that way it's not really possible to post what the politicians are saying directly but only filtered through someone elses article.
I was wondering how the Democrats were going to make sure the Republicans keep control of the Senate.
Trans rights are non-negotiable. Not supporting genocide is non-negotiable.
If you can't meet these extremely low standards, fuck you.
It's Iowa, he's not going to win anyway.
He's an idiot who can't read the room, and shouldn't be running as a democrat and should lose all his endorsements for this.
But he didn't have a chance in hell of winning anyway, and this reeks of a spoiler campaign like a fetterman or a manchin
All other things aside, he definitely has a chance to win. Perhaps not likely, but 40% chance is close to a toss up.
Last I checked he had a very slight lead in the polls. Within the margin though. Curious to see if this blatantly anti human rights stance he's suddenly taken will sink the campaign.
MAGA appreciates your surrender.
Transphobe's like this Josh Turek are the surrender to maga, you get that right? This shit is what maga wants and they're prepared to deliver
They appreciate your complicity.
Enjoy two more years of what you voted for asshat.
I voted straight ticket democrat already. All the way down. Even voted for unopposed democrats. On the first day the polls were open. Waited an hour and 15 minutes to do it. Insane turnout for where I live. Especially for a midterm.
You don't care because I'm critical of the genocide wing.
knowing I e not
Someone's taking their anger out on their keyboard.
Blocked.
And the amount of listening you're doing remains unchanged.
So you wish to vote in another John Fetterman.
was there another non actual republican option?
Just a increase in number for Democrat, yet the votes stay MAGA.
John Fetterman, the darling of the leftists?
At one time, yes. Then he suffered a TBI and became a conservative. Just another case that supports the theory that conservative brains are damaged brains.
You know how people complain that Republican voters just see the "R" next to the name and just vote for it? How they don't actually listen to what politicians are saying and that's why their representatives are garbage?
You're allowed to demand better from your politicians instead of demanding blind obedience from fellow voters.
Okay.. vote anyway.
You can do both things.
I honestly donβt care at this point. As long as people vote against the fascist. Everything else can be sorted out later.
I agree that when it comes time to vote 90% fascist is better than 100% fascist, but that doesn't mean being 90% fascist gets a free pass to "sort it out later" just because they're sightly better than 100% fascist.
Pushing back on their bullshit now gives them a chance to demonstrate their ability to listen to their constituents and apologize for it, which also gives them a chance to regain the votes they are losing from people who won't tolerate it.
If you're not willing to stand up for minorities, you do not deserve democracy.
How is this still a thing in the Dem party? Instead of joining the bullies, we should be embarrassing the asshole dems who think Trans people are anything other than people trying to exist just like we are. Am old enough to remember when dems joined the same politicized bullshit against gay people in the 80s, and then satanic panic in the 90s. Can we fucking grow up and learn something for once??
Because it was still the view of many of the people who would have called themselves Republicans in say 2010 but realized Trump wasn't good for the country or left the party for other reasons. They didn't just disappear, they joined the only other viable party and helped to shift it further right. Like when Desantis won Florida Governor in 2022, he won against then Democrat candidate Charlie Christ, whom was the Republican governor of Florida from 2007-2011. Christ didn't change all of his views, his views were suddenly just left of MAGA, but still right of where Democrats were in 2006
Plenty of space for all politicians at the bottom of the sea. We don't discriminate. All welcome down there...
top 39 comments