Using Google’s products and services has always been fundamentally precarious—doing so gives the world’s largest advertising company a lot of juicy personal data. Google has long said it won’t use the sensitive data from products like Gmail, Drive, and Photos for ad personalization, but a change to the company’s privacy policy appears to dismantle that firewall.

On October 16, Google issued an update to its privacy policy, spotted by Android Authority. The ad personalization section used to include a clear limit on data from certain apps. “We don’t show you personalized ads based on your content from Drive, Gmail, or Photos,” the document said. Now, Google has updated it with the following language.

https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Google-ads-privacy.png

This equivocation opens the door to using data from apps like Gmail and Photos in ads when it’s shared with other Google services, and it just so happens Google has a mechanism for doing that, with Personal Intelligence. The company released Personal Intelligence in early 2026, allowing users to hand data from multiple apps to Google AI products. The idea is that the added context from your existing data will lead to better AI answers, but it’s also proving to be a privacy minefield.

Personal Intelligence connects your data to the Gemini app but also to features like AI Mode search. While the Gemini app does not currently have ads, you may see sponsored content in AI search tools. Google’s changes to the privacy policy appear to acknowledge that data shared with AI search via Personal Intelligence could, therefore, contribute to ad personalization.

According to Google, this clarification still doesn’t mean ads are “based directly” on your personal data. Here’s the company’s full statement:

“Connecting your apps is entirely opt-in. Ads will continue to be relevant to things like your query, the context of the response and your interests. Ads will not be based directly on your Gmail inbox or Photos library, and as always, sensitive information will not be used to tailor ads.”

Google’s statement is essentially a roundabout way of confirming that Workspace and Photos data may inform ads. If you interact with AI Mode while Personal Intelligence is enabled, there’s a chance that summaries and insights from your data will inform the answers you get. Because that same data is used for ad targeting, it’s accurate to say that your personal data is an element of ad targeting in AI search. The privacy policy now makes that clear.

A Google spokesperson tells Ars that its privacy clarification does not indicate a change in how it handles your data with respect to its advertising partners. It’s not scanning your entire inbox to enhance your advertising profile, and it’s not giving any of this data to third parties. But if you pipe personal data into an AI search tool, the ads it shows you could be based on that information.

The personalization trap

The core of the problem is that Google wants its products and services to talk to each other. Google sees that wealth of data as a key strength of its AI efforts. Some apps like Gmail are still given protected status in Google’s data handling, but there are now more avenues for that data to get out. The more data you share across Google’s ecosystem, the greater the risk to your privacy.

We’ve seen a similar exception in the way Google uses your AI interactions for model training. While Google says it doesn’t use personal data for AI training, it does use your inputs and the model outputs for that purpose. With Gemini integrated with so many services and connected to them via Personal Intelligence, those outputs may very well contain elements of your personal information. Google has said it tries to filter that content from the user activity controls, therefore keeping it out of training sets. However, it doesn’t promise it will always be successful.

Google is correct that Personal Intelligence is opt-in, but the company uses various prompts and pop-ups to entice users to turn it on without fully explaining the consequences. You may have turned it on without realizing.

If you want to ensure ads never use your personal data in this way, you’ll need to make sure Personal Intelligence is turned off. The easiest way is to access the Gemini settings for Personal Intelligence and disable the connected apps. These settings are also a few levels deep in your main Google account settings under Data & privacy > Personalization settings > Manage Personalized Recommendations in Search Services > Connected Content Apps. From there, you can disable connections to Workspace and Google Photos.

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 2 weeks ago

No Gmail, no cry

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    The only solution is to treat the Gmail address like the address you get from your ISP: Do not use it as your main address, and only use it to communicate with the service.

    My Gmail address only exists in the Google universe. Only Google uses it to contact me and send me information and spam.

    The only thing I did is setting up a forwarding rule to forward all mails to my actual mail address where I filter and sort the mails, so I don’t need to manually check Gmail but get preprocessed information only.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago

    The only thing I did is setting up a forwarding rule to forward all mails to my actual mail address where I filter and sort the mails

    Thus google knows your real email address and can use that for profiling etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    I've been phasing mine out. Some junk and old things still go to it, but nothing remotely important or interesting to big data. Definitely need to sit down and clean it out for good though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    might? You mean to tell me it didn't already?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Fastmail for me.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Hot take: Honestly don't know why people care about this. The bigger problem is that they already have your data. Which means the government already has your data. Why do you care if they use it for advertising?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Ironically, the use of the wording "the personalization trap" in the article makes me think Gemini likely assisted in the writing. Gemini loves calling things traps.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    I figure these headlines are a best interpreted as a repeating reminder to degoogle.

    The hints have only increased in urgency over the past couple of decades, from "we might do marketing" to "we spy on you" to "we do genocide".

    Anyway -- nothing special about this headline, but finally I acted upon it: 1-2-3 backups of my google-email/photo/drive archives and reduced my google accounts to an empty skeleton (while I figure out if there's still any third party services I've forgotten about reliant on that email address).

    I'd mostly migrated away from google a decade ago, maybe I can dispose of this skeleton account by the end of the year.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Nothing new that Google read the Gmail content for personalized ads. Alphabet is an advertising company and surveillance advertising always was and is its business model.

  • source
  • 13 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [S] 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Google: We would never use your Gmail to target ads. Also Google: If you voluntarily pour your Gmail into our AI blender, whatever comes out may help target ads. Technically, we’re not reading your diary. We’re just selling billboards next to the therapist’s summary of it. Privacy by wordplay is still surveillance with better PR.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    I'm out. Moving my family .... including my 81 year old parents to Proton. They can do it - we have already moved to signal .. no issues.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yeah I’m at that point now too. Only issue is storage. I want to move my entire Gmail inbox but it’s too big for the free plan. Might have to cough up some dough if I can’t find a better alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    My biggest blocker by far in moving away, is calendars.

    My family has so many interconnected calendars (I personally have 12 on my phone right now) and I still haven't seen that anything else can do what Google does with calendars. My entire family (minus ex wife) is using Gmail on our own domain, and the ex still has r/w access to our kids' calendars (for noting play dates, doctor's appts, etc).

    Even syncing Google with Outlook is pure hell - in both directions - and that's before you start adding the interference from employers' firewalls and shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago

    Imagine the day when you go to some web site and see a picture of your wife, with a caption saying something like, "isn't it time that you talked to your doctor about Viagra?" How about those pre video ads on YouTube with your dead grandma, telling you to consider cremation?

    What does that really mean, to use your data for ad targeting? Can they use your pictures to generate an AI image of those you love?

    I see lots of posts that it doesn't affect you because you're not on Google services. What about that friend who took pictures at last week's happy hour? Grandma sharing pictures of her favorite granddaughter with her pickle ball group? Unless you're a hermit, you can't stop the slow trickle of your personal data being sucked up and stored for generations. It's your data, where are the laws to protect it?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    More unfiltered bullshit in inbox just means the remaining people will leave Gmail

    It's almost like being allowed to move King to Checkmate or check or whatever. Chess, mofo.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Are they now just saying the quiet out loud?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Have fun. I moved to Proton years ago.

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 23 points 2 weeks ago

    Might be? Lol

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  • Isn't that why they made gmail?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Google, you stink, like the poop in my toilet! Flush it down, flush it down so disgusting! Google you are making me gag because of your horrible stench. Please remove yourself from the equation.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Good reminder to migrate to a paid mail service. Ideally something in your own country.

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Google is an ad company.

    They have found a new feature to offer to make people accept sharing more data.

    This is exactly what they have done from the beginning. Same song, different verse.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I think the TLDR here is that it's only if you enable that Intelligence integration

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 weeks ago

    People still use Google?

  • source