no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
10 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
[–] 19 points 6 days ago (1 child)

I've signed more petitions in the past 3 years and gone to more protests than I have in my entire life. (Including opposing these bills).

The feds have completely tuned out protests since the 90s in my observation.

Between Harpers brutalizing G7 protestors and Trudeau sicking militarized police on BC water protectors, the uniparty feds have learned they can just ignore moral protests.

Shitty Conservative opposition is signing off on this bill and NDP voters largely abandoned the NDP to vote in this fucking nightmare gov.

I legit don't know what to do.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago*

    I legit don’t know what to do.

    There is nothing much you can do, maybe you could tell your representative that they would lose your vote if they voted for this..

    Well, unless you are willing to dedicate your life to create a new populist (doesn't matter if it's left-right or center) political force to actually get somewhere, like some Serbians & Hungarians have done in recent years.

    The kind of protest that would have actual impact will not happen in Canada anytime soon, almost no matter what happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago

    I’ve emailed my tone-deaf, copy-paste responding MP and added my name to every blast to the senate.

    There is nothing more to be done. I now have to wait for my country to make an own-goal and hope they have the self-awareness to reverse course when the completely predictable services pullout happens.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Messaged my MP.

    He seems to be on the right side of every issue, so I hope he's right here as well.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Oppose how? It's in the senate already. Pretty much a done deal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    I signed petitions and donated to this more times than I care to count. I have not heard of local protests for this in my area, but I don't know what else to do. Writing to my MP was part of the petitions, too.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 1 week ago*
    9 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Wtf is wrong with these government people? We're currently undergoing the single greatest period in Internet hacking and they're debating this? Every day all I hear about now is this was hacked and that was compromised online, and these people want to weaken security for their citizens, for what? A couple big photo ops while risking the info of 40 million people. Not a good trade-off. Plus, making the companies store this data, sensitive info, just is asking for hackers to steal and exploit it. The companies won't improve their security for the government. It's not a profitable undertaking.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Cool, can't wait for this to pass and I have to rent a server in Panama just to read my email.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    If there is a company in Panama that offers services in Canada, that means for their Canadian customers they are keeping 6 months of metadata in an easily accessible server in Canada. If they aren't, then Canada must IP block their services. VPN services that do not keep 6 months of your metadata also must be IP blocked.
    The only way to get around this is to physically leave Canada.

    This includes the team behind Lemmy. Being Canadian, after this bill, if they aren't logging every single ping that reaches their website and making sure it is easily accessible, they are committing a crime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (1 child)

    When your VPS gets blocked get a new one.

    No level of government has the time to play whack-a-mole. If they start blanket blocking IP ranges it will be too disruptive to legit traffic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago

    No level of government has the time to play whack-a-mole.

    Hence why the likely outcome of this is that any website that originates outside of Canada will just be blocked, unless the company agrees to maintaining 6 months of metadata in Canada. They can just tell the ISPs to block any traffic outside of Canada and have a whitelist.

    Whatever data that comes into Canada will have its metadata stored in easily accessable data centres.

    They managed to do this with the Great Firewall of China, so don't think that it isn't possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago

    I love how all western countries are like, see how bad China is with surveillance?, then do exactly the same thing.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago*

    Serious question, how can regular people oppose this? The Liberals have basically a majority government, and seem dead set on pushing this through. The only thing I can think of is to encourage Canadian workers to organize and join their local working class organization, be it a union or their local NDP riding.

    Hell, at this point The Communist Party sounds pretty good compared to Neoliberal alternatives.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    I impatiently await all of the private information of the members of parliaments and their extended families being inadvertently released with quarterly updates.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    I think this is Canada's response to the US CLOUD Act and FISA 702. But, implied in this response is that Canada's power system is uninterested in resolving the privacy issues that flow from those invasive pieces of US legislation as it relates to Canadians. Instead, it seems that the system has become interested or accustomed to access to this Canadian data, and wants it to continue with domestic legislation.

    Ultimately, as we've seen with Salt Typhoon and other iterations of it, these types of indiscriminate legislation chips away at our collective rights, and makes the world less safe. With the recent news of the PHP vulnerabilities, and the eMudhra Certificate Security fiasco, it's quite clear that building back doors to systems that have difficulty maintaining their front doors creates more instability and uncertainty.

    https://ici.radio-canada.ca/rci/en/news/2182863/health-data-cloud-servers-canada-us

    https://www.recordinglaw.com/news/fisa-section-702-surveillance-lapse/

    https://www.computerworld.com/article/4239619/emudhra-quits-global-tls-certificate-market-after-compromise-of-ca-signing-keys.html

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/php-cybersecurity-vulnerability-explainer-9.7392394

  • source