post
I admittedly didn't finish reading the article, and maybe there's some that I've missed.
I think a large issue with the discussion of capitalism is that it largely ignores discussion of free market, well regulated, capitalism.
This article is right, shareholders of major corporations are not taking risks.
But small, local companies? They are. Even if they're an LLC. Suppliers realized that small businesses were all LLCs and most of them would go belly up. So why would they give any credit terms to the small time businesses? That'd be ridiculously risky. The suppliers make the owners personally sign for the risk.
Small business owners are also caught between, "do you quit a job that gives healthcare or do you moonlight?" Until your business is thriving you are making the choice of bankrupting and losing everything if you get hit by a car or burning out and losing everything.
If there was universal healthcare, we would have lowered the barriers of entry to entrepreneurship, which is a good thing. It would also reduce the risk.
I personally would love to see an economy of small business, in every (or as many as feasible) industry. One where the owner is present. One where its easy for the worker to think their boss isn't doing things the way they would and go on and make a new business doing it the way they believe it should be done.
Small business takes on a lot of the risk talked about in the article. It'd be nice to separate it so that there can be real talks of reform.
The worker has much more say in a small company too.


1 comment