And they believe the government institutions should be free to be forced to punish and discriminate against anyone their religion condemns.

In Qu'ran they recognize the divinity of Jesus Christ and endorse his new covenant, as well as call out jewish hypocrisy so idk, as far as muslims go, they were already practicing christians...all the extra rules are because they forgot they were the children of Ishmael and they simply practice dietary restrictions etc as an acknowledgement of their own renewed covenant with GOD/Adonai (cant use the lord's name in vain, people do it this way because the reader may not be in a state of reverance at the time)

I knew immediately when his answer was “free will” as to why El-Sayed could practice his own faith that he was gonna be revealed as a Nazi or Nazi adjacent. Free will is also something Christian extremists like to punish, or even kill over.

Don't eat the onion. This is McSweeneys.

He really really struggled before he said that he believed that El-Sayed should not be free to practice Islam.

I am a reasonable man and am certain that your holy book is an absolute heap of disgusting, slavery condoning, male infant genital mutilation demanding, repellent, demented, vicious dark age mumbo jumbo. Christians should be told quite clearly that our citizens have the legal right to criticise, lampoon, ridicule and mock god and Jesus to their heart's content, in any way that they wish: that Christians have no special claim to protection from the rough and tumble of post-Enlightenment intellectual, political and social life. If they cannot live in a society in which this is the case, they should go somewhere else; they are, after all, spoilt for choice, at least in theory.