• EU leaders have asked the European Commission to develop a proposal by the end of the year for the new powers, which would be deployed in an extreme case where a rival was seen as attacking the EU's economy.
  • The commission is also evaluating trade data to consider replicating a cap on hybrid car imports in other sectors where shipments from China may be surging, including chemicals and machinery.

The European Union is preparing to create new trade powers that could completely shut off access to its single market as part of a dramatic new push to cut the trade deficit with China. EU leaders meeting in Brussels Thursday asked the European Commission, which handles trade matters for the bloc, to develop a proposal by the end of the year, according to people familiar with the matter. The powers would be deployed in an extreme case where a rival, such as China, was seen as attacking the EU’s economy. “If China engages in certain unfair trade practices, we could restrict the entry of Chinese products into the European market, including a complete closure of our market,” Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda told reporters on the sidelines of the summit. “That would be an extreme measure, a drastic instrument.”

...

As part of a rapidly expanding arsenal of trade powers, the commission has also begun evaluating trade data as a first step toward replicating a cap on hybrid car imports in other sectors where shipments from China — or other countries — may be surging, said a separate person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

...

The instrument that could be used to shut off access to the EU’s single market is seen as a so-called second-strike measure, the people familiar with the plans said. Its existence is intended to deter rivals from using unfair policies to weaken European companies or from starting a trade war against the EU with retaliatory measures.

...

Removepaywall

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
19 comments in c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk view that post
[–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Good. The practice of the Chinese taxpayer subsidizing the loss to monopolize industries must be stopped.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'm worried about surveillance by:

    • Chinese phones with Android operating system from USA, able to listen to everyone.
    • Most computers with American operating systems seeing what companies do.
    • Chinese and American surveillance cars getting to record video of everything.

    AbWd5a7Wg4588bC.png

    go4A0q07072Deux.webp

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    Good. They have been using the Eu as a dumping ground for a while.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Dumping ground for the things that Europeans keep buying?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I was thinking more about heavy industry.

    The chinese are making a big push to put the eu wind industry out of business by dumping wind turbines at below cost on the market. Once the eu manufacturers go out of business, they will then up the price and yet another market will be held hostage by the chinese.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    The chinese are making a big push to put the eu wind industry out of business by dumping wind turbines at below cost ...

    Yes, but this isn't only limited to the wind industry but to all sectors. And, more importantly, China aims to use this later as leverage for all kinds of economic and political coercion trying to achieve other goals unrelated to these industries (Taiwan, Philippines, human rights, ...).

    It's noteworthy that China is exploiting it's own labour force to produce cheap goods, which includes the use of forced labour and a 996 working culture that is widespread (despite it's illegal). Also, environmental regulations are very weak in China.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    This seems logical, but how do you place the case with solar? I think the same thing happened circa 2010, but solar is cheap today.

    I mean, I'm all for developing and maintaining local innovative industries, but that's not what policy EU governments tend to enact. It most often devolves into some kind of protectionist infighting that revolves around expensively reinventing wheels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    This seems logical, but how do you place the case with solar?

    I don't think you can equate the two. Anyone can buy solar and put it not their roofs, it's become more of a commodity.

    While these giant wind turbines are more industrial infrastructure investment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    In response, China countered by continuing to exist.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    why actually compete and innovate when you can just stifle the competition. it's the neoliberal way..

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    China is extracting money and knowlesge from the eu through state funded manufscturing programs.

    Selling at a loss is not competing. It is strategic anti competition. These practices ensure we cant grow our industries here. Why are all our solar panels, inverters and batteries coming out of china? Because they are state funded manufacturers over there, subsidising cost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 6 comments in c/europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] -1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    In response, China continues to exist.

    Checkmate, EU. 😂

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

    .ml

    baby account

    ruzzia, China

    Could you possibly be more stereotypical?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

    Could you articulate a thought beyond ad hominems?

    .world kept giving me 503 errors. And listening to bootlickers complain about .ml sold me.

    Couldn't be happier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Just calling it as I see it 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments