It may or may not be merged. Nonetheless it's certainly a step forward into genAI adoption for our beloved OS.

I would really like to know what's going to happen: better code or just the appearance of it?

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 3 weeks ago*

Linus used to shame large companies for not contributing to open source, now he shames devs for not using the large companies closed source software.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 3 weeks ago

    he also introduced at least one bug/vulnerability in the form of a race condition.

    HIS FIRST VIBED COMMIT. The commit that at least should have been the most carefully scrutinized before handing it in. Then he left the cleanup to other maintainers and went on a vacation.

    Linus needs to step down, he has fucking lost it.

  • source
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] -4 points 3 weeks ago (-1 children)

    Claude models are really. I've been used them for so long. My colleagues too. I noticed a major improvement in code quality and enablement of developers. Now front end developers can take on more serious back end work in my team. As an analogy for this, I expect better outcome for Linux.

    Guys, AI could perform outstanding hacks and can enable now mass hacks in a way never seen before. It also enables serious security scans and uncovered lots of serious security flaws. So why wouldn't it help get better kernel?

  • source
  • hideshow -1 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)