In the European Union, side guards had been required on all trucks since 1989.
Enough said. Adopt it. Why do we do this to ourselves?
In the European Union, side guards had been required on all trucks since 1989.
Enough said. Adopt it. Why do we do this to ourselves?
Interesting and informative video, thanks for sharing! I'd never see these before at all, they seem like a no brainer
That's a good piece of tech, should be mandatory for trucks registered to work in the city.
Another safety tip for cyclists, cars and motorbikes: don't try to pass a right turning truck even if it looks like the driver is providing a gap to their right. They need that because the back wheels will take a shorter way around the curb, you don't want to be in the way there, which is an easy way for incidents like this to happen. Stay well back when approaching, or pass on the left.
This is the standard in countries with road safety laws. The first and only truck from an EU country I could find from a 1 minute long image search that lacked those guards was this one:

In the European Union, side guards had been required on all trucks since 1989.
I don't remember to ever seen this. The European trucks seem to be smaller, and maybe the space is used more efficiently... ?
EDIT: i saw the images posted in the comments... yeah i've seen them, but they do not look like a fence, just something occupying the space, i always assumed it was something that was necessary for the normal operation of the truck.
EDIT 2: The next time i left home, i saw one... I guess i never paid attention. So forget my comment
Good video but a terrible opening
Excuse me, excuse me, but this is a clearly unscripted random interaction with a fellow probably human.
…yeah, it soured me on the rest as well, although it sounds like the idea itself is good. heh
Why the fuck are they giving exemptions to vehicles that are constantly on city roads?
It sounds like it's something they can only require them on vehicles whose companies have contracts with the city. If true, I'd assume that the exempted trucks aren't hauling away city waste - maybe construction debris or something like that.
What a shitty law.
I thought you couldn't be right. Whelp.
... requires large vehicles in the City Fleet and in City contracted vehicles be equipped with safety enhancing side guards ...
https://rules.cityofnewyork.us/rule/side-guards-on-heavy-duty-trade-waste-vehicles/
why were people given religious covid exemptions
Two types of people in the world: those who don't think about the need for this and those who spent time on liveleak.
The dude's priority list at the end...
Expected a joke.
Discovered a tragedy.
Also a neat device.
NY, get your heads out of your asses and just do it. Get it done! 100% of trucks! Big fines for it not being there! Go!
Hell, this should just be all urban areas in the world.
It is in EU, and in UK, and in Japan.
It's only third world nations, such as USA, that have such shoddy safety standards as this
Going from arguably the world's strongest superpower, to at least pejoratively a third world is so depressing.
All it takes is Conservatism!
Pejorative and Actually too
Third World under the strictest definition: Not in NATO or the Warsaw Pact (no longer exists, was a pact between USSR, China and some other random countries)
I’ve never seen those guards in Finland, which is part of the E.U.
EU has a lot of fragmented (by country) road laws.
But guards/skirts are usually integrated into the design, not third-party add-ons.
Random examples:

I've never seen guards like this either, but more importantly I've never seen the large gaps in the side that guides victims to fall beneath multiple wheels.
I suspect all the trucks I've seen in Europe left the factory compliant with the regulation, with no need to install side guards.
I opened Google Street View and "drove" along Mannerheimintie. Here are images of all trucks I found along the "drive":



...and then I figured I'd try some rednecky place, and the most redneck place I could pick from my hat was Kauhava (sorry, everyone in Kauhava). I figure that if in some place they drive trucks with illegal modifications, then that's there.
So, I went for truck hunt there as well, which turned out to be much more difficult than I thought! Anyway, here:

I am not able to find a truck in Finland that does not have those protecting devices installed. And I don't think I have ever seen one.
Toothless laws to let businesses save some money at the cost of people’s live
"Technology" aka portable fence
I mean, yeah. A lot of innovations in safety is really just stupidly simple things that we learned the hard way (someone being hurt).
The stupid part however isn't how simple these things are, but rather how hard it is to get through even the most basic changes.
Before I opened this and saw the video, I thought it was going to be an indicator light.
Cringe ass advertisement.
What product or service was it trying to sell to its audience?
That question just might be answered by watching the posted content! But I don't blame you for not, this was a rough watch.
I got about 15 seconds in before the visceral disgust was too much to bear. I'd rather the answer be a mystery than listen to more fucking "TIL: I am about to preach to you" posters
A ban on trucks?
Trucks will always be needed. Trains can't go everywhere.
Also, the passenger-train utopia we both want would require lighter-duty high-speed rail, which freight trains wouldn't be able to operate on
Not boxcars, no. But up to the 50s we had electric rail in my area that handled panel-van kind of packages from station to station, via shipping cars hooked to the same train as passengers.
Then pneumatic tires and gasoline-powered buses got popular and they killed electric rail. We still haven't the reach, speed, or versatility as we had then, since buses need to fight traffic against cars.
Mandate the guards for all trucks and make it tax deductible, insurance bonus, something like that.
When I was a kid, we learned "if your feet are on black stuff, you could be in danger. Pay attention."
How is this going to work better?
all 7 comments