Man who is paid to say the company should not be liable: "The company should not be liable"

Sure, I bought the gun. I loaded it with live rounds. Yeah, I aimed it at the guy. I won't deny I pulled the trigger, either. However, once the bullet left the barrel, I stopped being responsible for it! The bullet killed him, not me!

If any other dev lab had approached security the way they did, they’d be massively sued for negligence. And the suits would succeed.

We aren’t in the dot com bubble anymore.

Ford was not responsible for the pinto, nor takata for their airbags, your honor

so weird, if nobody is responsible for anything, what's the fucking point. no reason to trust the product. a bunch of babies. be a man, and own up to your shit.

Lets make defense bots that learn to kill evil people on their own, and then not be liable when billionaires die.

Your honor, when I took off the parking brake, put the car in neutral, and gave it a big push down the hill, it was in the interest of science, to see how far it would go. I think a lot hinges on intent here. It certainly was not my intent to mow down five children at a bus stop.

Putting aside the obvious "yes they should," if they're not liable when bad things happen, they also shouldn't get any credit for good things.

His point is that without intent there shouldn't be liability...

How could you even claim that as a lawyer. I wouldn't be surprised if most liability is without intent.

OpenAI: "How could we possibly have predicted the outcome of our actions?!?"

Everyone that has been shouting for years about the inevitable outcome of their actions: "... FUCKING SERIOUSLY?"

How about: it is a hacking tool that has been used to commit cyber crimes. It should be confiscated and destroyed.