all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 134 points 1 month ago
[–] 101 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 73 points 1 month ago
    [–] 54 points 1 month ago
    [–] 50 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If I had a quarter for every pixel in this image I'd have a nickle

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 47 points 1 month ago
    [–] 44 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Too high quality, need fewer pixels.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Just in case someone is missing context, this post is making fun of the other post that was posted with the same title but with really bad image quality (probably cuz of a bug)

    Bad quality is entirely the point

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    W̵̼̘͔͐a̸̱͊̽̇̌i̵̯̹̋̈́t̷̬̬͌́͜ ̷̟̜̯̿̌I̴̡͑ ̸̣̗̫͂͒͂ḓ̵̢̺͚̐̅o̷͇͌n̸̪̝̋͐͜’̷͎̲̎͜t̵̢̧̼͖̐͋̂͝ ̷̹̱̻̬͂͛̓g̷̖̬͇̊͛͐e̵͔̼͑͌̃t̵̠̼̟͛̀ ̸̖͖̈́͆͠į̴͊́͊ţ̶̠͔̎̚

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago

    This post looks like an N64 texture.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Too many pixels. I can still tell this is a social media post.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Well if only I could actually see.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    This is the second post I’ve seen where everyone is baffled by how low res it is. Is something broken with Lemmy.world’s pictrs?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago