all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 1 month ago

“I mean, sure, the court documents back that ad up, but we still think it’s defamation!”

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Why don’t you sue her again then, pussy. What a lil bitch.

  • source
  • 15 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    According to the Times’ reporting, at least 81 one-time Marshall patients have been arrested for missing court dates stemming from their unpaid medical bills, with one patient taken into custody owing just $114.

    The Times investigation also found that Marshall or his office sued more than 700 patients for unpaid bills throughout his two-decade career.

    Oh well, I guess they'll have to make an advert about one of the other hundreds of people he did this to then. Not that it will sway Republican voters, for whom callousness is a feature.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 1 month ago

    Time for someone to learn about the Streisand effect....

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Is it defamation if it's true?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    The truth is a 100% defense. It’s only defamation if you KNOWINGLY speak a false statement that is harmful to the reputation. Add to it that public figures have a higher threshold than members of the public to prove defamation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Literally it's not, but practically it sometimes is, if you don't have the money for representation or time to take off work to fight it. This guy is obviously used to using his money to bully people. I'm assuming it's not going to work in his favor this time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago

    Let it go trail and we get discovery they will drop the lawsuit. He is scum and should be buried under a prison.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    I didn't know Kansas was doing the end run around debtor's prisons as well. Utah has been doing this shit for a decade or more.

    Big city firms buy distressed debt, sue in the big city where they have friendly and I presume paid off judges, and when defendants don't show up, they get contempt charges on them. If they pay they get out of jail. If not, after 30 or 60 days they get out, only for it to happen again.

    Usury. A rejection of Christianity, of Christ, and a stain on your ShitHoly States! Fuck you.

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Fuck this guy, but I’m down to get rid of official attack ads in general.

    Of course I despise advertisements of all varieties, but political attack ads are a special type of unwelcome assault on our collective mental health.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    this isn't the usual 'attack' ad though.. which is why the magat is so riled-up. it's based on facts, including verifiable and indisputable public records kinds of facts, that he can't make up some bullshit to counter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    I also hate attack ads, but probably mostly because they are all sensationalized and half truths. If someone brings receipts, I don't care as much, but I absolutely hate all political ads, positive or negative. I can't wait until after the midterms are done.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/pravda_news@news.abolish.capital view that post
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Defamation: Act of injuring another's reputation by any slanderous communication, written or oral; the wrong of maliciously injuring the good name of another; slander; detraction; calumny; aspersion.

    Slander: A false and malicious statement or report about someone

    Defamation does not apply in this case, as the temporary Senator has no good reputation to be harmed. Furthermore the statements are not false, therefore there is no slander.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Defamation: Act of injuring another's reputation by any slanderous communication, written or oral; the wrong of maliciously injuring the good name of another; slander; detraction; calumny; aspersion.

    Defamation does not apply in this case, as the temporary Senator has no good reputation to be harmed.

  • source