all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 58 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Who in their right mind believed that AI was going to reduce emissions? I've got a nice bridge to sell them

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    Sure! If you tell me how long, wide and tall this bridge should be as well as the various live and dead loads it must support I can help you design:

    1- A complete bridge concept.
    2- A template for a master plan to begin planning the concept.
    3- A good process to develop a proper name for your bridge concept.
    4- A table game to theoretically "play" Devil's advocate against the possible rejection of your concept.

    If you sign in for 20,000,000 tokens I can create a drawing of your consept, split it into a connect-a-number drawing and give you a PDF that you can print to make your bridge concept a real conceptual concept of a real concept!

    Its notional at this point. Would you like a Python program with that?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Ai was supposed to cut emissions...? 😅

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Why would something that requires massive amounts of power cut emissions.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Uncensored LLMs are now also really good at helping users who might want to increase fossil fuel companies operating costs. I stumbled across this when using AI to help me come up with a way of breaking up a large boulder on my land.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Because of course they fucking are

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Never once have I heard this. Joke propaganda post.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    It's almost as if more technology won't solve the problem if we can't use the technology we already have responsibly.

  • source