An artificial intelligence 'Doctor Who' was sent to the BBC's Matt Brittin and he said it was "pretty good"

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I had never heard of Matt Brittin until now but I've already lost all respect for him.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago*

    CGI in Doctor Who is one thing, but it seems so misguided to use AI to generate an episode from whole cloth. I wouldn't want that even if they were just recreating the lost episodes with it, let alone making new ones :(

  • source
  • [–] [S] 17 points 1 month ago

    chuckles I'm Doctor Who is in danger

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Exciting. It means the BBC can dispense with writers now. Quite soon the AI will be able to design and generate all SFX so no human input will be needed. After that, it's just a matter of replacing actors with AI modes and the BBC won't even need to film the show.

    Of course, at that point the show will only be watched by bots who will write reviews and make Youtube vidoes to be watched by other bots. The future is glorious!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    AI can be campy. I think that’s maybe one reason they feel this way. And it’s a reason this also feels like a threat to Doctor Who. Oof.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Or he generated one and is testing the waters over its reception.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    I think the issue with this isn’t whether an ai can generate an episode, can it generate hundreds of coherent episodes that are actually entertaining?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    And even if it can...why would I want to watch that? What's the point of exiting if we aren't able to do anything?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well maybe yeah on some level. It could be a fun thing is we could theoretically extend our shows as long as we wanted or whatever, maybe? But I am more saying I don’t think the tech actually works that way, it just seems like it does. Like ChatGPT doesn’t have the literal millions of unique jokes it would actually take to replace anyone who really writes jokes, it’s a lake that’s an inch deep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I don’t want shows that run forever. I want stories that have endings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Not to defend ai, but can Doctor Who writers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Only if the BBC hires good ones. They seem to always want to kill the show even though it's probably their global top hit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    RLM has a good idea for Star Trek. People are tired of short seasons and years between them. Force the writers to work with a limited budget and time frame.

    I would go back to the quarries and focus on banging out longer stories and longer seasons. Let more guest writers in to experiment and see if the popular ones want to sign on long term. No more universe ending threats for the season finale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    Yeah I agree. Give us 20 episodes and churn them out. Give space for exploring it. Also, retcon the re-destruction of Gallifrey and have some old-school episodes of arrogant space aristocrats.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Episode like whole production? Or script?

    Even as someone who doesn't like generative AI, I'd be very curious to see it.

    Even if you don't like AI, it could be framed within an arc. The AI generated episode is the first. The second is the Doctor convincing people it's not them. The third episode is revealing the aliens behind it (e.g. the Daleks) and going to where they are and deleting the source.

    ...Eh, I'm not sure I'd go for that.

    ...but I'm not sure it wouldn't be worse than the last few series...

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago

    To be honest, I watched it and it was gripping can't believe how consistent it was.

    The scripts and direction where by a human with the AI doing the visuals.

    It was a bit odd in a couple of places but other than that the story was really good.

  • source
  • AI visuals look good and the voices are also good. It does not surprise me someone can write some really good scenes. As far as I can tell it only ever works for zoomed in dialog spaced with pretty static imagery. And dynamic action or physics is a joke.

  • source