all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 1 month ago (1 child)

I had a boss one time legitimately and seriously say "stop listening to what I'm saying and listen to what I'm telling you."

WTF am I supposed to do with that?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    They say that because the listener is so focused on exactly what is said, likely adding non-relevant context or missing context, and dragging out things instead of understanding the message that is being conveyed.

    For example, when I say pick up trash to mean things to throw away and the kiddo focuses on whether she considers something that should be thrown away to be trash she is focused on what I am saying but not what I am telling her. "It isn't trash, I just don't need it." Then just throw it away!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    People don't tell me I'm too literal, they just hint at it and imply it. Strongly disagree.

    🤔 1
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    They're actually answering correctly, the question isn't if they're too literal, everyone is literal most of the time, it's finding out if it's to the point that people have to bring it up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago*

    One person frequently tells me I'm too literal, and also tells me that most other people we know think I'm too literal.

    However only one person actually tells me, and "people" implies multiple, therefore I'm marking this one down as a "strong disagree".

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I feel like these test are just designed to tell everyone they’re autistic.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think it's the other way around actually. I was told once that if you're the type to never enter Strongly agree unless you 100% agree, that gets factored in to the score. I usually take these tests with a bit more nuance but I'm not inclined to believe the test is that well designed unless I see how the score is calculated.

    In any event, anyone with a tablespoon full of self-awareness can pretty much score whatever they want on the AQ50. They're just hoping you'll fill it in as honestly as you can but it's essentially 25x the question 'I am autistic' and 25x 'I am not autistic'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    You’ve got my reasoning correct (the questions are too pointed and susceptible to confirmation bias), but I still disagree with you in that these tools are designed to tell most people they have autism even if minor.

    Some egregious questions that always pop up are “do sounds annoy you”(paraphrasing) and “do you find that social situations can be overwhelming”, and an especially bad one: “do you get fixated on specific topics or collections of items”. Most people will say yes, because they have hobbies and think they are “quirky” but this is really referring to obsession with stuff to the point it degrades your life.

    Because of that susceptibility and the probability that a lot of people taking these tests already subconsciously think they might be autistic leads to basically everyone coming away from those tools with “signs of autism” at the least.

    Then we end up in the current society where it’s apparently cool to be autistic and not some life ruining disease it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    People have told me that, but that was only like five people out of hundreds I've talked to. The question is asking generally. I don't think less than one percent of people counts as "in general" so I'm gonna disagree.

    If I'd never heard anyone say that before, I'd strongly disagree, but since I've heard it a few times, I'll just disagree instead.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago*

    If people don't generally tell you that, then the answer to the question is disagree

  • source