no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
12 comments in c/halo@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 8 points 1 month ago

Asha "Chop Shop" Sharma

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    On the one hand 343 as a studio was deeply incompetent and didn't deserve Halo. On the other, it was their namesake and they at least had reason to try. A random Activision studio getting it with zero investment in the property scares me more.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    No no, literally any studio would be an improvement coming from 343 "Halo Studios." I would take a Halo game from an Electronic Arts or Ubisoft studio at this point. There is no way to make it any worse, so at most it would stay the same.

    I certainly would have preferred not Activision, but at least they have a lot of experience with a wide variety of games they published. There is more potential there than with 343.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I have a feeling it's gonna get worse and in time people will do historical revisionism and start praising the 343 era games.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Damn from a dogshit dev to another dogshit dev.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • 1 comment in c/xbox@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Really bummed to hear they weren't able to establish a future for Ninja Theory. They make bangers.

  • source