1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 month ago

You know what a deal with Trump is worth, I know and they know. This buys a little time, not much more.

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 32 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Denmark and the U.S. already have a long-standing security agreement that has allowed the U.S. to deploy forces in Greenland, and it was not immediately clear how this deal was different from that.

    It's possible this is one of those nothinburger 'yuge deals' he likes to parade around to stroke his own ego and make his cult cheer.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I mean without the public having seen the deal yet, from what it seems like, the deal contains the exact same thing as the last deal from 1951. So basically exactly that. But hey, he can try to spin it as a win to his base.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago

    The Danes need to reject this. It was announced there was a CIA pressure campaign. This is corruption.

  • source