all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 1 month ago

In the photo, he's sitting by himself across from a timer-operated camera. This is a reference to the fact that he has no friends.

  • source
  • [–] 60 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Imagine having a bio.

    No one cares about your stupid fucking bio.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    My bios/similar are either empty or whatever I put there as a teen... Except for one where I put "Green Is My Pepper", I should use that more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago

    Can't see them in Voyager. But I write myself nice little notes next to their username about how they act around polite strangers

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    Predicts their own posts are shit

    "I win haha"

    I too can "beat" a grandmaster in chess if they're playing to win and I'm playing to lose

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (3 children)

    More like, if you are petty enough to dive into someones history rather than judge what was written...they do have a point. You are exiting the scope of a comment, thus yielding current discussion and try to find a point of critique in the bigger picture. Kinda sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Usually I'm there to block them. I also think it's "sad" that you're suggesting holding someone accountable by checking what they've written in the past and how it compares to what they're currently saying isn't valid, as if there is no obligation to have consistent beliefs. If you're just there to find the one time they said something cringe and dunk on them for it, sure, that is stupid; but the concept of checking someone's history isn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    I am too used to people confusing discussing what is presented with looking for any way to invalidate what was written. Even the biggest, nastiest troll can have a point, and not being able to refute it is not a reason to try and instead go the way of "yeah, you are nasty in other posts so you must be trolling" or similiar.

    But yeah, I admit, didn't think about entering profile just to block someone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I read replies but I don't always respond.

    Sometimes I have nothing else to add, and sometimes you can tell someone is looking for an argument. I've had someone outright threaten me here already in a reply and obviously I'm just not going to engage with aggressive people like that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    The fuck you just said? Ill have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and Ive been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills, don't you turn your back on me

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    They won't need replies? They don't need justification for bans then.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    "Pay attention to me or you're banned" is... a take.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    I feel more like Joseph joestar. I have predicted next 5 steps of people that just repeat themselves, do I just feel corny.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Wtf is a bio? Why would I want to know any of you.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Literally you.

  • source